*       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

        Name name = new Name(mockConfig, "TEST", 0x20, null);
        byte[] dst = new byte[100];

        int length = name.writeWireFormat(dst, 0);

        // Check first byte is 0x20
        assertEquals(0x20, dst[0]);

        // Check encoded name (TEST -> encoded as pairs)
        // T = 0x54 -> upper nibble: 0x5 -> 0x46 (F), lower nibble: 0x4 -> 0x45 (E)

        byte[] buffer = new byte[512];
        int written = trans2QueryFSInfo.writeParametersWireFormat(buffer, 0);

        // Should write 2 bytes: information level
        assertEquals(2, written);

        // Check information level (SMB_INFO_ALLOCATION maps to 0x0001)
        int actualInfoLevel = SMBUtil.readInt2(buffer, 0);
        assertEquals(0x0001, actualInfoLevel);
    }

    @Test

                               "' has a reference type ", DataTypeString(dt))
             : absl::OkStatus();
}

// Converts `ninputs` and `inputs` into `inputs_tensors` and `input_nodes` and
// does various checks while doing so. `input_nodes` will contain the same
// information as input_tensors just in a different structure to make
// following processing easier. TODO(iga): Simplify this nested structure.
absl::Status ProcessInputs(

{* ../../docs_src/path_params/tutorial002.py hl[7] *}

Bu durumda, `item_id` bir `int` olarak tanımlanacaktır.

/// check | Ek bilgi

Bu sayede, fonksiyon içerisinde hata denetimi, kod tamamlama gibi konularda editör desteğine kavuşacaksınız.

///

Ви можете визначити тип параметра шляху у функції, використовуючи стандартні анотації типів Python:

{* ../../docs_src/path_params/tutorial002.py hl[7] *}

У такому випадку `item_id` визначається як `int`.

/// check | Примітка

Це дасть можливість підтримки редактора всередині функції з перевірками помилок, автодоповнення тощо.

///

## <abbr title="або: серіалізація, парсинг, маршалізація">Перетворення</abbr> даних