.certificatePinner(certificatePinner)
        .build()

    // Add a bad intermediate CA and have that issue a rogue certificate for localhost. Prepare
    // an SSL context for an attacking webserver. It includes both these rogue certificates plus the
    // trusted good certificate above. The attack is that by including the good certificate in the
    // chain, we may trick the certificate pinner into accepting the rouge certificate.

  /**
   * This is a less carefully-controlled version of {@link #testRemovalNotification_clear} - this is
   * a black-box test that tries to create lots of different thread-interleavings, and asserts that
   * each computation is affected by a call to {@code clear()} (and therefore gets passed to the

   * inequality.
   */
  protected final <T> void setDefault(Class<T> type, T value) {
    tester.setDefault(type, value);
  }

  /**
   * Sets two distinct values for {@code type}. These values can be used for both null pointer
   * testing and equals testing.
   *
   * @since 17.0
   */
  protected final <T> void setDistinctValues(Class<T> type, T value1, T value2) {
    tester.setDistinctValues(type, value1, value2);
  }

     * contrast to the "V?" type that we're using. As a result, Kotlin sees a conflict between the
     * nullness annotations in ImmutableMap and those in its own Map type. In response, it considers
     * the parameter and return type both to be platform types. As a result, Kotlin permits calls
     * that can lead to NullPointerException. That's unfortunate. But hopefully most Kotlin callers
     * use `get(key) ?: defaultValue` instead of this method, anyway.

Esse é o caso da maioria das aplicações web.

Geralmente são muitos usuários, e seu servidor está esperando pelas suas conexões não tão boas para enviar as requisições.

E então esperando novamente pelas respostas voltarem.

Essa "espera" é medida em microssegundos, e ainda assim, somando tudo, é um monte de espera no final.

  // finalizer will be added to/removed from the object's finalizers list.
  // Either this field or PropagationPolicy may be set, but not both.
  // +optional
  optional bool orphanDependents = 3;

  // Whether and how garbage collection will be performed.
  // Either this field or OrphanDependents may be set, but not both.
  // The default policy is decided by the existing finalizer set in the

      TypeToken<?> convertToType = type.resolveType(Converter.class.getTypeParameters()[1]);
      @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // returns default for both F and T
      T defaultConverter = (T) defaultConverter(convertFromType, convertToType);
      return defaultConverter;
    }
    if (type.getRawType().isInterface()) {
      return newDefaultReturningProxy(type);

    logger.addHandler(logHandler);
    ServiceManager manager =
        new ServiceManager(Arrays.<Service>asList(new FailRunService(), new FailStartService()));
    // Due to the implementation of the two services we know that both are now failed.  So the
    // following awaitHealthy call is just to get the exception.
    manager.startAsync();
    assertThat(manager.servicesByState().get(State.FAILED)).hasSize(2);
    IllegalStateException e =

        @Override
        public String toString() {
            return stringPart.toString() + digitPart.toString();
        }
    }

    /**
     * Represents a version list item. This class is used both for the global item list and for sub-lists (which start
     * with '-(number)' in the version specification).
     */
    private static class ListItem extends ArrayList<Item> implements Item {
        @Override

  // Defaults to True.
  optional string status = 2;
}

// PodFailurePolicyRule describes how a pod failure is handled when the requirements are met.
// One of onExitCodes and onPodConditions, but not both, can be used in each rule.
message PodFailurePolicyRule {
  // Specifies the action taken on a pod failure when the requirements are satisfied.
  // Possible values are:
  //