val endsFirst = buildRequestThread(secondRequest, secondResponseCode)
    endsFirst.start()
    endsFirst.join()
    // First response is still waiting.
    assertThat(firstResponseCode.get()).isEqualTo(0)
    // Second response is done.
    assertThat(secondResponseCode.get()).isEqualTo(200)
    latch.countDown()
    startsFirst.join()
    // And now it's done!
    assertThat(firstResponseCode.get()).isEqualTo(200)
    // (Still done).

  <name>Guava ListenableFuture only</name>
  <description>
    An empty artifact that Guava depends on to signal that it is providing
    ListenableFuture -- but is also available in a second "version" that
    contains com.google.common.util.concurrent.ListenableFuture class, without
    any other Guava classes. The idea is:

    - If users want only ListenableFuture, they depend on listenablefuture-1.0.

	// This imperfect implementation means we cannot tell the difference between
	//	#define A #define B(x) x
	// and
	//	#define A #define B (x) x
	// The first definition of B has an argument, the second doesn't. Because we let
	// text/scanner strip the blanks for us, this is extremely rare, hard to fix, and not worth it.
	return s.pos
}

func (s *Slice) Close() {

  }

  private HashMultiset(int distinctElements) {
    super(Maps.<E, Count>newHashMapWithExpectedSize(distinctElements));
  }

  /**
   * @serialData the number of distinct elements, the first element, its count, the second element,
   *     its count, and so on
   */
  @GwtIncompatible
  @J2ktIncompatible
    private void writeObject(ObjectOutputStream stream) throws IOException {
    stream.defaultWriteObject();

        }.build()

    executeSynchronously(request)
      .assertBody("body")

    assertThat(client.routeDatabase.failedRoutes).isEmpty()
    // TODO check if we expect a second request to server1, before attempting server2
    assertThat(server1.requestCount).isEqualTo(2)
    assertThat(server2.requestCount).isEqualTo(1)

    assertThat(clientTestRule.recordedConnectionEventTypes()).containsExactly(

		Usage:  "bind to a specific ADDRESS:PORT for embedded Console UI, ADDRESS can be an IP or hostname",
		EnvVar: "MINIO_CONSOLE_ADDRESS",
	},
	cli.DurationFlag{
		Name:   "shutdown-timeout",
		Value:  time.Second * 30,
		Usage:  "shutdown timeout to gracefully shutdown server (DEPRECATED)",
		EnvVar: "MINIO_SHUTDOWN_TIMEOUT",
		Hidden: true,
	},

	cli.DurationFlag{
		Name:   "idle-timeout",

        assertEquals(Arrays.asList("a", "b", "c"), result);
    }

    public void test_first_element_from_list() {
        Map<String, Object> doc = new HashMap<>();
        List<String> list = Arrays.asList("first", "second", "third");
        doc.put("key", list);

        assertEquals("first", DocumentUtil.getValue(doc, "key", String.class));

        List<String> numList = Arrays.asList("123", "456", "789");

            return null;
        })).status(Status.OK).result());
    }

    // DELETE /api/admin/joblog/log/{id}
    /**
     * Deletes a specific job log.
     * Useful for cleaning up old job execution records.
     *
     * @param id the job log ID to delete
     * @return JSON response with deletion status
     */
    @Execute
    public JsonResponse<ApiResult> delete$log(final String id) {

    * Si on compare Uvicorn, il faut le comparer à d'autre applications de serveurs comme Daphne, Hypercorn, uWSGI, etc.
* **Starlette** :
    * A les seconde meilleures performances après Uvicorn. Starlette utilise en réalité Uvicorn. De ce fait, il ne peut qu’être plus "lent" qu'Uvicorn car il requiert l'exécution de plus de code.

	// Inter-node JWT token expiry is 100 years approx.
	defaultInterNodeJWTExpiry = 100 * 365 * 24 * time.Hour
)

var (
	errInvalidAccessKeyID = errors.New("The access key ID you provided does not exist in our records")
	errAccessKeyDisabled  = errors.New("The access key you provided is disabled")
	errAuthentication     = errors.New("Authentication failed, check your access credentials")
	errNoAuthToken        = errors.New("JWT token missing")