testRequestMethod("GET", true)
  }

  @Test
  fun requestMethodHeadIsNotCached() {
    // We could support this but choose not to for implementation simplicity
    testRequestMethod("HEAD", false)
  }

  @Test
  fun requestMethodPostIsNotCached() {
    // We could support this but choose not to for implementation simplicity
    testRequestMethod("POST", false)
  }

  @Test

* fix incorrect prometheus azure metrics ([#77722](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/77722), [@andyzhangx](https://github.com/andyzhangx))
* Fixed a bug in the apiserver storage that could cause just-added finalizers to be ignored on an immediately following delete request, leading to premature deletion. ([#77619](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/77619), [@caesarxuchao](https://github.com/caesarxuchao))

* Update cadvisor to v0.23.9 to fix a problem where attempting to gather container filesystem usage statistics could result in corrupted devicemapper thin pool storage for Docker. ([#30307](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/30307), [@sjenning](https://github.com/sjenning))



# v1.3.5

  /*
   * If n <= millerRabinBases[i][0], then testing n against bases millerRabinBases[i][1..] suffices
   * to prove its primality. Values from miller-rabin.appspot.com.
   *
   * NOTE: We could get slightly better bases that would be treated as unsigned, but benchmarks
   * showed negligible performance improvements.
   */
  private static final long[][] millerRabinBaseSets = {
    {291830, 126401071349994536L},

        }
        return false;
    }

    /**
     * Simple connection retry logic - could be enhanced with exponential backoff
     */
    private boolean shouldRetryConnection() {
        // For now, allow one retry. Could be enhanced with more sophisticated logic.
        return true;
    }

    /**
     * @param context
     * @param name
     */

        } catch (final CrawlerSystemException e) {
            httpGet.abort();
            throw e;
        } catch (final Exception e) {
            httpGet.abort();
            throw new CrawlingAccessException("Could not process " + robotTxtUrl + ". ", e);
        } finally {
            EntityUtils.consumeQuietly(httpEntity);
        }
    }

    /**
     * Converts a robots.txt pattern to a regular expression.
     *

}

func objPartToPartErr(part ObjectPartInfo) error {
	if strings.Contains(part.Error, "file not found") {
		return InvalidPart{PartNumber: part.Number}
	}
	if strings.Contains(part.Error, "Specified part could not be found") {
		return InvalidPart{PartNumber: part.Number}
	}
	if strings.Contains(part.Error, errErasureReadQuorum.Error()) {
		return errErasureReadQuorum
	}
	return errors.New(part.Error)
}

- The scheduling queue didn't notice any extenders' failures, it could miss some cluster events,
  and it could end up Pods rejected by Extenders stuck in unschedulable pod pool in 5min in the worst-case scenario.

 * </dl>
 *
 * <p>A few notes about IPv6 "IPv4 mapped" addresses and their observed use in Java.
 *
 * <p>"IPv4 mapped" addresses were originally a representation of IPv4 addresses for use on an IPv6
 * socket that could receive both IPv4 and IPv6 connections (by disabling the {@code IPV6_V6ONLY}
 * socket option on an IPv6 socket). Yes, it's confusing. Nevertheless, these "mapped" addresses

See [CVE-2021-32677](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/security/advisories/GHSA-8h2j-cgx8-6xv7) for more details.