context.detail("Fixed: " + "relativePath corrected from '" + currentRelativePath + "' to '"
                            + correctRelativePathStr + "'");
                    return true;
                }
            } catch (Exception e) {
                context.failure("Failed to compute correct relativePath" + ": " + e.getMessage());
            }
        }

        return false;

        byte[] buffer = new byte[512];
        trans2SetFileInfo.writeParametersWireFormat(buffer, 0);

        // Check FID is written correctly
        int actualFid = SMBUtil.readInt2(buffer, 0);
        assertEquals(fid & 0xFFFF, actualFid);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test writeDataWireFormat")
    void testWriteDataWireFormat() {

 * prevention and <i>no</i> expectation of bit dispersion. This leaves them perfectly suitable for
 * use in hash tables, because extra collisions cause only a slight performance hit, while poor bit
 * dispersion is easily corrected using a secondary hash function (which all reasonable hash table
 * implementations in Java use). For the many uses of hash functions beyond data structures,

 * prevention and <i>no</i> expectation of bit dispersion. This leaves them perfectly suitable for
 * use in hash tables, because extra collisions cause only a slight performance hit, while poor bit
 * dispersion is easily corrected using a secondary hash function (which all reasonable hash table
 * implementations in Java use). For the many uses of hash functions beyond data structures,

* The behavior of some watch calls to the server when filtering on fields was incorrect.  If watching objects with a filter, when an update was made that no longer matched the filter a DELETE event was correctly sent.  However, the object that was returned by that delete was not the (correct) version before the update, but instead, the newer version.  That meant the new object was not matched by the filter.  This was a regression from behavior between cached watches on the server side and uncached...

	MOVK	$0, R10                                          // ERROR "zero shifts cannot be handled correctly"
	MOVK	$(0<<32), R10                                    // ERROR "zero shifts cannot be handled correctly"
	TLBI	PLDL1KEEP                                        // ERROR "illegal argument"

    @Test
    public void testSuccessfulOperation() throws CIFSException {
        String result = circuitBreaker.executeWithCircuitBreaker(() -> "success");
        assertEquals("success", result, "Operation should return correct result");
        assertEquals(State.CLOSED, circuitBreaker.getState(), "State should remain CLOSED");
        assertEquals(0, circuitBreaker.getFailureCount(), "Failure count should remain 0");
    }

    @Test

        char[] testPassword = "CharArrayPass789!".toCharArray();
        NtlmPasswordAuthenticator auth = new NtlmPasswordAuthenticator("testuser", testPassword);

        // Verify password is stored correctly
        assertArrayEquals(testPassword, auth.getPasswordAsCharArray());
        assertEquals(new String(testPassword), auth.getPassword());

        // Verify that modifying original array doesn't affect stored password

                        .inactiveRequiredProjects(MODULE_B)
                        .expectResult(MODULE_C_2, INDEPENDENT_MODULE),
                scenario("Selected projects in wrong order are resumed correctly in order")
                        .activeRequiredProjects(MODULE_C_2, MODULE_B, MODULE_A)
                        .resumeFrom(MODULE_B)
                        .expectResult(MODULE_B, MODULE_C_2),

        fileBothDirectoryInfoNonUnicode = new FileBothDirectoryInfo(mockConfig, false);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test constructor initializes fields correctly")
    void testConstructor() {
        assertNotNull(fileBothDirectoryInfo);
        assertNotNull(fileBothDirectoryInfoNonUnicode);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test getName returns filename")