}

    protected void registerModifiedProperty(String propertyName) {
        __modifiedProperties.addPropertyName(propertyName);
        registerSpecifiedProperty(propertyName); // synchronize if exists, basically for user's manual call
    }

    public void modifiedToSpecified() {
        if (__modifiedProperties.isEmpty()) {
            return; // basically no way when called in Framework (because called when SpecifyColumn exists)

    }

    /**
     * Setter to specify the list of annotations that allow missed documentation.
     * Only short names are allowed, e.g. {@code Generated}.
     *
     * @param userAnnotations user's value.
     */
    public void setSkipAnnotations(String... userAnnotations) {
        skipAnnotations = Arrays.asList(userAnnotations);
    }

    /**
     * Setter to specify pattern for types to ignore.
     *

        TestRefreshableFessUser user = new TestRefreshableFessUser("testuser", true);
        assertTrue(user.refresh());
        assertEquals(1, user.getRefreshCount());

        // Test multiple refreshes
        user.refresh();
        user.refresh();
        assertEquals(3, user.getRefreshCount());

        // Test custom implementation that returns false
        user = new TestRefreshableFessUser("testuser", false);

    }
    assertThat(socket.enabledCipherSuites)
      .containsExactly(*expectedCipherSuites.toTypedArray())
  }

  @Test
  fun tls_stringCiphersAndVersions() {
    // Supporting arbitrary input strings allows users to enable suites and versions that are not
    // yet known to the library, but are supported by the platform.
    ConnectionSpec
      .Builder(ConnectionSpec.MODERN_TLS)
      .cipherSuites("MAGIC-CIPHER")

    executor.execute(task);
    assertEquals(1, numCalls.get());
  }

  /*
   * Under Android, MyError propagates up and fails the test?
   *
   * TODO(b/218700094): Does this matter to prod users, or is it just a feature of our testing
   * environment? If the latter, maybe write a custom Executor that avoids failing the test when it
   * sees an Error?
   */
  @AndroidIncompatible

                String user = index != -1 ? auth.substring(0, index) : auth;
                final String password = index != -1 ? auth.substring(index + 1) : "";
                index = user.indexOf('\\');
                if (index == -1) {
                    index = user.indexOf('/');
                }
                final String domain = index != -1 ? user.substring(0, index) : defaultDomain;

        assertEquals(customPath, webApiRequest.getServletPath());
    }

    @Test
    public void test_getServletPath_withEmptyQueryString_returnsCustomPath() {
        final String customPath = "/api/v1/users";
        mockRequest.setQueryString("");
        webApiRequest = new WebApiRequest(mockRequest, customPath);

        assertEquals(customPath, webApiRequest.getServletPath());
    }

But in this case, the same **FastAPI** application will handle the API and the authentication.

So, let's review it from that simplified point of view:

* The user types the `username` and `password` in the frontend, and hits `Enter`.

Birçok durumda FastAPI uygulamanız daha büyük olacaktır ve farklı *path operation* gruplarını ayırmak için muhtemelen tag'leri kullanacaksınız.

Örneğin **items** için bir bölüm, **users** için başka bir bölüm olabilir ve bunları tag'lerle ayırabilirsiniz:

{* ../../docs_src/generate_clients/tutorial002_py310.py hl[21,26,34] *}

### Tag'lerle TypeScript Client Üretme { #generate-a-typescript-client-with-tags }

Applications expected to be installed on older Android devices should consider adopting the
[Google Play Services’ ProviderInstaller][provider_installer]. This will increase security for users
and increase connectivity with web servers.

### Certificate Pinning ([.kt][CertificatePinningKotlin], [.java][CertificatePinningJava])