}
        }

        @Override
        public void remove() {
          if (toRemove == null) {
            throw new IllegalStateException("no calls to next() since the last call to remove()");
          }
          forward().remove(toRemove.getKey());
          toRemove = null;
        }
      };
    }
  }

  @Override
  public NavigableSet<K> navigableKeySet() {

          }
        }

        @Override
        public void remove() {
          if (toRemove == null) {
            throw new IllegalStateException("no calls to next() since the last call to remove()");
          }
          forward().remove(toRemove.getKey());
          toRemove = null;
        }
      };
    }
  }

  @Override
  public NavigableSet<K> navigableKeySet() {

            threads[i] = new Thread(() -> {
                try {
                    Thread.sleep((long) (Math.random() * 10));
                    if (index == threadCount - 1) {
                        // Last thread wipes password
                        auth.secureWipePassword();
                    } else {
                        // Other threads try to read password
                        String pwd = auth.getPassword();

## Overview

Replication relies on immutability provided by versioning to sync objects between the configured source and replication target. Replication results in the object data, metadata, last modification time and version ID all being identical between the source and target. Thus version ordering is automatically guaranteed on the source and target clusters.

### Replication of object version and metadata

     * occurs an <code>SmbException</code> will be thrown. If the credentials are
     * valid, the method will return without throwing an exception. See the
     * last <a href="../../../faq.html">FAQ</a> question.
     * <p>
     * See also the <code>jcifs.smb1.smb1.client.logonShare</code> property.
     *
     * @param dc the domain controller to authenticate against

       * AGP: https://github.com/google/guava/issues/7769.
       *
       * My impression is that an AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater in a static field is similarly fast to
       * Unsafe on modern JVMs (if perhaps not quite as fast as VarHandle?). However, I'm not sure
       * exactly what we've benchmarked, and we certainly haven't benchmarked as far back as JDK 8.

     */
    protected CrawlerClient getClient(final String url) {
        return clientFactory.getClient(url);
    }

    /**
     * Checks if the content has been updated since the last crawl.
     * @param client The crawler client.
     * @param urlQueue The URL queue entry.
     * @return true if content is updated, false otherwise.
     */

            writer.write("192.168.1.200 TESTHOST\n");
        }

        when(mockConfig.getLmHostsFileName()).thenReturn(lmhostsFile.getAbsolutePath());

        // Use getByName to trigger populate
        // Last entry should win
        NbtAddress result = lmhosts.getByName("TESTHOST", mockContext);
        assertNotNull(result);
    }

    @Test
    void testIOExceptionDuringRead() throws IOException {

* `filename` - Si se establece, se incluirá en el response `Content-Disposition`.

Los responses de archivos incluirán los headers apropiados `Content-Length`, `Last-Modified` y `ETag`.

{* ../../docs_src/custom_response/tutorial009_py39.py hl[2,10] *}

También puedes usar el parámetro `response_class`:

{* ../../docs_src/custom_response/tutorial009b_py39.py hl[2,8,10] *}

{* ../../docs_src/settings/tutorial001_py39.py hl[2,5:8,11] *}

/// tip

If you want something quick to copy and paste, don't use this example, use the last one below.

///