The most secure is the code flow, but it's more complex to implement as it requires more steps. As it is more complex, many providers end up suggesting the implicit flow.

/// note

It's common that each authentication provider names their flows in a different way, to make it part of their brand.

But in the end, they are implementing the same OAuth2 standard.

///

	// do not re-arrange the struct this struct has been ordered to use less
	// space - if you do so please run https://github.com/orijtech/structslop
	// and verify if your changes are optimal.
	ended        time.Time  `msg:"end"`
	started      time.Time  `msg:"st"`
	lastHandout  time.Time  `msg:"lh"`
	lastUpdate   time.Time  `msg:"u"`
	bucket       string     `msg:"b"`
	filter       string     `msg:"flt"`
	id           string     `msg:"id"`

inline void TF_ImportGraphDefOptionsSetPropagateDeviceSpec(
    TF_ImportGraphDefOptions* opts, unsigned char propagate_device_spec) {
  opts->opts.propagate_device_spec = propagate_device_spec;
}

}  // end namespace tensorflow

  GraphDef g;
  if (!tensorflow::ParseProtoUnlimited(&g, proto, proto_len)) {
    status->status = InvalidArgument("Invalid GraphDef");
    return;
  }
  status->status = s->session->Extend(g);
}

}  // end extern "C"

// Reset helper for converting character arrays to string vectors.
static void TF_Reset_Helper(const TF_SessionOptions* opt,
                            const char** containers, int ncontainers,

# Test-related settings below this point.
test --build_tests_only --keep_going --test_output=errors --verbose_failures=true
test --test_timeout=500,900,-1,-1
# Give only the list of failed tests at the end of the log
test --test_summary=short

# "nonpip" tests are regular py_test tests.
# Pass --config=nonpip to run the same suite of tests. If you want to run just

        pos += 8;

        byte[] workstationBytes = readSecurityBuffer(material, pos);
        int workstationOffset = readULong(material, pos + 4);
        pos += 8;

        boolean end = false;
        int flags;
        String charset;
        if ( lmResponseOffset < pos + 12 || ntResponseOffset < pos + 12 || domainOffset < pos + 12 || userOffset < pos + 12
                || workstationOffset < pos + 12 ) {

    }

    // Verify edges
    for (const EdgeSpec& e : e_edges) {
      ASSERT_TRUE(a_edges.find(e) != a_edges.end())
          << "Failed to find expected edge " << e.ToString()
          << " in fdef: " << fdef.DebugString();
    }
    for (const EdgeSpec& e : c_edges) {
      ASSERT_TRUE(a_edges.find(e) != a_edges.end())
          << "Failed to find expected control edge " << e.ToString()
          << " in fdef: " << fdef.DebugString();

   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>Furthermore, this method guarantees that the range returned will be one of the following
   * canonical forms:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>[start..end)
   *   <li>[start..+∞)
   *   <li>(-∞..end) (only if type {@code C} is unbounded below)
   *   <li>(-∞..+∞) (only if type {@code C} is unbounded below)
   * </ul>
   */
  public Range<C> canonical(DiscreteDomain<C> domain) {

        // but we want to have a single bucket with N batches.
        // As a workaround, we repeat the bucket N times, and deduplicate the result at the end
        val resultIncludingDuplicates = splitIntoBuckets(
            LinkedList(subProjectTestClassTimes),
            SubprojectTestClassTime::totalTime,
            { largeElement, factor ->

    else -> skip(newline + 1)
  }
}

/**
 * Reads lines from `IdnaMappingTable.txt`.
 *
 * Comment lines are either blank or start with a `#` character. Lines may also end with a comment.
 * All comments are ignored.
 *
 * Regular lines contain fields separated by semicolons.
 *
 * The first element on each line is a single hex code point (like 0041) or a hex code point range