/**
   * Test that verifies the resource leak fix for <a
   * href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/5756">Issue #5756</a>.
   *
   * <p>This test covers a scenario where we write a smaller amount of data first, then write a
   * large amount that crosses the threshold (transitioning from "not at threshold" to "over the
   * threshold"). (We then write some more afterward.) This differs from the existing

     *
     * @return the offset
     */
    public final int getOffset() {
        return this.offset;
    }

    /**
     * Adjusts the offset by the specified amount.
     *
     * @param n the amount to adjust the offset
     */
    public void adjustOffset(final int n) {
        this.offset += n;
    }

    /**
     * Gets the data length.
     *
     * @return the dataLength

    }
    return tmp;
  }

  @Benchmark
  long parseUnsignedLong(int reps) {
    long tmp = 0;
    // Given that we make three calls per pass, we scale reps down in order
    // to do a comparable amount of work to other measurements.
    int scaledReps = reps / 3 + 1;
    for (int i = 0; i < scaledReps; i++) {
      int j = i & ARRAY_MASK;
      tmp += UnsignedLongs.parseUnsignedLong(decimalStrings[j]);

  /**
   * Test that verifies the resource leak fix for <a
   * href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/5756">Issue #5756</a>.
   *
   * <p>This test covers a scenario where we write a smaller amount of data first, then write a
   * large amount that crosses the threshold (transitioning from "not at threshold" to "over the
   * threshold"). (We then write some more afterward.) This differs from the existing

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public FakeTicker setAutoIncrementStep(long autoIncrementStep, TimeUnit timeUnit) {
    checkArgument(autoIncrementStep >= 0, "May not auto-increment by a negative amount");
    this.autoIncrementStepNanos = timeUnit.toNanos(autoIncrementStep);
    return this;
  }

  /**
   * Sets the increment applied to the ticker whenever it is queried.
   *

    list.add(new MockRunnable(countDownLatch), exec);
    assertEquals(3L, countDownLatch.getCount());

    list.execute();

    // Verify that all of the runnables execute in a reasonable amount of time.
    assertTrue(countDownLatch.await(1L, SECONDS));
  }

  public void testExecute_idempotent() {
    AtomicInteger runCalled = new AtomicInteger();
    list.add(
        new Runnable() {

        this.crawlerRunning = crawlerRunning;
    }

    /**
     * Represents a rule for controlling crawler intervals.
     * Each rule defines a time range, applicable days, and delay amount.
     */
    public static class IntervalRule {
        /** Starting hour of the interval */
        protected int fromHours;

        /** Starting minute of the interval */
        protected int fromMinutes;

  }

  /**
   * Sends the given method call to this thread.
   *
   * @throws TimeoutException if this thread does not accept the request within a reasonable amount
   *     of time
   */
  private void sendRequest(String methodName, Object... arguments) throws Exception {
    if (!requestQueue.offer(new Request(methodName, arguments), TIMEOUT_MILLIS, MILLISECONDS)) {

   * "expected arrival time of the next request" is actually in the past, then the difference (now -
   * past) is the amount of time that the RateLimiter was formally unused, and it is that amount of
   * time which we translate to storedPermits. (We increase storedPermits with the amount of permits
   * that would have been produced in that idle time). So, if rate == 1 permit per second, and

    /**
     * Gets the current state of the named pipe
     * @return the namedPipeState
     */
    public int getNamedPipeState() {
        return this.namedPipeState;
    }

    /**
     * Gets the amount of data available to read from the pipe
     * @return the readDataAvailable
     */
    public int getReadDataAvailable() {
        return this.readDataAvailable;
    }

    /**