int i = 0;
    for (Object e : elements) {
      array[i++] = (String) e;
    }
    return create(array);
  }

  /**
   * Creates a new collection containing the given elements; implement this method instead of {@link
   * #create(Object...)}.
   */
  protected abstract List<String> create(String[] elements);

  @Override
  public String[] createArray(int length) {
    return new String[length];
  }

    int i = 0;
    for (Object e : elements) {
      array[i++] = (Character) e;
    }
    return create(array);
  }

  /**
   * Creates a new collection containing the given elements; implement this method instead of {@link
   * #create(Object...)}.
   */
  protected abstract List<Character> create(Character[] elements);

  @Override
  public Character[] createArray(int length) {

    int i = 0;
    for (Object e : elements) {
      array[i++] = (UnhashableObject) e;
    }
    return create(array);
  }

  /**
   * Creates a new collection containing the given elements; implement this method instead of {@link
   * #create(Object...)}.
   */
  protected abstract T create(UnhashableObject[] elements);

  @Override
  public UnhashableObject[] createArray(int length) {

 * registering the extractor with the {@link ExtractorFactory}.
 * </p>
 *
 * <p>
 * Subclasses should implement the actual extraction logic in their own
 * methods, leveraging the helper methods provided by this abstract class.
 * </p>
 *
 */
public abstract class AbstractExtractor implements Extractor {

    /** The crawler container. */
    @Resource
    protected CrawlerContainer crawlerContainer;

    /**

    * If you didn't use FastAPI and used Starlette directly (or another tool, like Sanic, Flask, Responder, etc) you would have to implement all the data validation and serialization yourself. So, your final application would still have the same overhead as if it was built using FastAPI. And in many cases, this data validation and serialization is the biggest amount of code written in...

 * // ... perform domtrip operations ...
 * // Document is automatically updated
 * </pre>
 */
public abstract class AbstractUpgradeStrategy implements UpgradeStrategy {

    /**
     * Template method that handles common logging and error handling.
     * Subclasses implement the actual upgrade logic in doApply().
     */
    @Override
    public final UpgradeResult apply(UpgradeContext context, Map<Path, Document> pomMap) {

 * {@link ValueGraph}, and {@link Network}):
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * someGraphAlgorithm(startNode, graph);
 * }
 *
 * This works because those types each implement {@code PredecessorsFunction}. It will also work
 * with any other implementation of this interface.
 *
 * <p>If you have your own graph implementation based around a custom node type {@code MyNode},

    // Provide two implementations: an anonymous class and a Mockito mock
    static Stream<Arguments> implementations() {
        SessionSetupHandler anon = new SessionSetupHandler() {
            // no methods to implement (marker interface)
        };
        SessionSetupHandler mock = mock(SessionSetupHandler.class);
        return Stream.of(Arguments.of(anon), Arguments.of(mock));
    }

    @Test

/**
 * Any object which can accept registrations of {@link TearDown} instances.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @since 10.0
 */
@DoNotMock("Implement with a lambda")
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public interface TearDownAccepter {
  /**
   * Registers a TearDown implementor which will be run after the test proper.
   *
   * <p>In JUnit4 language, that means as an {@code @After}.
   *

/**
 * Any object which can accept registrations of {@link TearDown} instances.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @since 10.0
 */
@DoNotMock("Implement with a lambda")
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public interface TearDownAccepter {
  /**
   * Registers a TearDown implementor which will be run after the test proper.
   *
   * <p>In JUnit4 language, that means as an {@code @After}.
   *