Boolean result1 = (Boolean) constantTimeMethod.invoke(null, password1, password2);
        Boolean result2 = (Boolean) constantTimeMethod.invoke(null, password1, password3);

        assertTrue(result1, "Identical passwords should be equal");
        assertFalse(result2, "Different passwords should not be equal");
    }

    /**
     * Measure the average time for equals operations.
     */

 * even {@code java.util.HashSet}, and places considerably less load on the garbage collector. Like
 * {@code java.util.LinkedHashSet}, it offers insertion-order iteration, with identical behavior.
 *
 * <p>This class should not be assumed to be universally superior to {@code
 * java.util.LinkedHashSet}. Generally speaking, this class reduces object allocation and memory

   * value that are {@linkplain Range#isConnected connected} to this range.
   *
   * <p>The behavior of {@link #get(Comparable) get(k)} after calling this method is identical to
   * the behavior described in {@link #put(Range, Object) put(range, value)}, however the ranges
   * returned from {@link #asMapOfRanges} will be different if there were existing entries which

   * 'affect' a bit(j) in the output if two inputs, identical but for bit(i), will differ at output
   * bit(j) about half the time
   *
   * <p>Funneling is pretty simple to detect. The key idea is to find example keys which
   * unequivocally demonstrate that funneling cannot be occurring. This is done bit-by-bit. For each
   * input bit(i) and output bit(j), two pairs of keys must be found with all bits identical except

         * ours. Therefore, we have to be careful about whether we create our own TypeVariable:
         *
         * 2a. If the resolved types are identical to the original types, then we can return the
         * original, identical JDK TypeVariable. By doing so, we sidestep the problem entirely.
         *
         * 2b. If the resolved types are different from the original types, things are trickier. The

### Certificate-based authentication

`--sftp=trusted-user-ca-key=...` specifies a file containing public key of certificate authority that is trusted
to sign user certificates for authentication.

Implementation is identical with "TrustedUserCAKeys" setting in OpenSSH server with exception that only one CA
key can be defined.

If a certificate is presented for authentication and has its signing CA key is in this file, then it may be

    }
    int[] stripes = new int[result.size()];
    for (int i = 0; i < result.size(); i++) {
      stripes[i] = indexFor(result.get(i));
    }
    Arrays.sort(stripes);
    // optimize for runs of identical stripes
    int previousStripe = stripes[0];
    result.set(0, getAt(previousStripe));
    for (int i = 1; i < result.size(); i++) {
      int currentStripe = stripes[i];
      if (currentStripe == previousStripe) {

        byte[] out14 = new byte[16];
        byte[] out7 = new byte[8];

        // Act
        NtlmUtil.E(key14, data8, out14);
        NtlmUtil.E(key7, data8, out7);

        // Assert: first block identical to single-chunk encryption
        assertArrayEquals(Arrays.copyOfRange(out14, 0, 8), out7);
        // And second block is present and not all zeros

        byte[] signingKey2 = Smb3KeyDerivation.deriveSigningKey(dialect, sessionKey, preauthIntegrity);

        // Then - should produce identical results
        assertArrayEquals(signingKey1, signingKey2, "Same input should produce same output");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should handle empty session key")
    void testDeriveKeys_EmptySessionKey() {

	if db5.Error != nil {
		t.Errorf("Should not raise error for join where identical fields in different tables. Error: %s", db5.Error.Error())
	}

	var users6 []User
	DB.Joins("inner join pets on pets.user_id = users.id AND pets.name = @Name", user.Pets[0]).Where("users.name = ?", user.Name).First(&users6)