/// info

This requires installing `ujson` for example with `pip install ujson`.

///

/// warning

`ujson` is less careful than Python's built-in implementation in how it handles some edge-cases.

///

{* ../../docs_src/custom_response/tutorial001.py hl[2,7] *}

/// tip

 * {@code String} and a {@code String} to an {@code int} that treat the {@code int} as an unsigned
 * number.
 *
 * <p>Users of these utilities must be <i>extremely careful</i> not to mix up signed and unsigned
 * {@code int} values. When possible, it is recommended that the {@link UnsignedInteger} wrapper
 * class be used, at a small efficiency penalty, to enforce the distinction in the type system.
 *

    private static int expandedCapacity(int oldCapacity, int minCapacity) {
      if (minCapacity < 0) {
        throw new AssertionError("cannot store more than MAX_VALUE elements");
      }
      // careful of overflow!
      int newCapacity = oldCapacity + (oldCapacity >> 1) + 1;
      if (newCapacity < minCapacity) {
        newCapacity = Integer.highestOneBit(minCapacity - 1) << 1;
      }
      if (newCapacity < 0) {

         * Therefore, we can always create our own TypeVariable.
         *
         * 2. Under the JDK, the built-in TypeVariable implementation does not interoperate with
         * ours. Therefore, we have to be careful about whether we create our own TypeVariable:
         *
         * 2a. If the resolved types are identical to the original types, then we can return the

    private static int expandedCapacity(int oldCapacity, int minCapacity) {
      if (minCapacity < 0) {
        throw new AssertionError("cannot store more than MAX_VALUE elements");
      }
      // careful of overflow!
      int newCapacity = oldCapacity + (oldCapacity >> 1) + 1;
      if (newCapacity < minCapacity) {
        newCapacity = Integer.highestOneBit(minCapacity - 1) << 1;
      }
      if (newCapacity < 0) {

    if (minCapacity < 0) {
      throw new IllegalArgumentException("cannot store more than Integer.MAX_VALUE elements");
    } else if (minCapacity <= oldCapacity) {
      return oldCapacity;
    }
    // careful of overflow!
    int newCapacity = oldCapacity + (oldCapacity >> 1) + 1;
    if (newCapacity < minCapacity) {
      newCapacity = Integer.highestOneBit(minCapacity - 1) << 1;
    }
    if (newCapacity < 0) {

      if (minCapacity < 0) {
        throw new IllegalArgumentException("cannot store more than Integer.MAX_VALUE elements");
      } else if (minCapacity <= oldCapacity) {
        return oldCapacity;
      }
      // careful of overflow!
      int newCapacity = oldCapacity + (oldCapacity >> 1) + 1;
      if (newCapacity < minCapacity) {
        newCapacity = Integer.highestOneBit(minCapacity - 1) << 1;
      }
      if (newCapacity < 0) {

      if (minCapacity < 0) {
        throw new IllegalArgumentException("cannot store more than Integer.MAX_VALUE elements");
      } else if (minCapacity <= oldCapacity) {
        return oldCapacity;
      }
      // careful of overflow!
      int newCapacity = oldCapacity + (oldCapacity >> 1) + 1;
      if (newCapacity < minCapacity) {
        newCapacity = Integer.highestOneBit(minCapacity - 1) << 1;
      }
      if (newCapacity < 0) {

    if (minCapacity < 0) {
      throw new IllegalArgumentException("cannot store more than Integer.MAX_VALUE elements");
    } else if (minCapacity <= oldCapacity) {
      return oldCapacity;
    }
    // careful of overflow!
    int newCapacity = oldCapacity + (oldCapacity >> 1) + 1;
    if (newCapacity < minCapacity) {
      newCapacity = Integer.highestOneBit(minCapacity - 1) << 1;
    }
    if (newCapacity < 0) {

         * Therefore, we can always create our own TypeVariable.
         *
         * 2. Under the JDK, the built-in TypeVariable implementation does not interoperate with
         * ours. Therefore, we have to be careful about whether we create our own TypeVariable:
         *
         * 2a. If the resolved types are identical to the original types, then we can return the