//	#define A #define B(x) x
	// and
	//	#define A #define B (x) x
	// The first definition of B has an argument, the second doesn't. Because we let
	// text/scanner strip the blanks for us, this is extremely rare, hard to fix, and not worth it.
	return s.pos
}

func (s *Slice) Close() {

  url: https://github.com/AlertRED
hard-coders:
  login: hard-coders
  count: 15
  avatarUrl: https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9651103?u=95db33927bbff1ed1c07efddeb97ac2ff33068ed&v=4
  url: https://github.com/hard-coders
Joao-Pedro-P-Holanda:
  login: Joao-Pedro-P-Holanda
  count: 14
  avatarUrl: https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/110267046

 * {@code SmbTransport} collaborator and is used only for
 * demonstration – the real class behaviour is not required for
 * validating constants.
 */
public class SmbConstantsTest {

    /**
     * Verify that the hard‑coded default values are present.
     */
    @Test
    @DisplayName("Default constant values match expectations")
    void defaultValues() {
        assertEquals(445, SmbConstants.DEFAULT_PORT);

 * bad design, and it does not prevent anyone from using the declaration---and experience has shown
 * that they will. If the method breaks the encapsulation of its class, then its internal
 * representation will be hard to change. Instead, use <a
 * href="http://errorprone.info/bugpattern/RestrictedApi">RestrictedApiChecker</a>, which enforces
 * fine-grained visibility policies.
 *
 * @author Johannes Henkel
 */
@GwtCompatible

    }

    @Override
    public boolean isDisconnected() {
        return delegate.isDisconnected();
    }

    @Override
    public boolean disconnect(boolean hard, boolean inuse) throws IOException {
        synchronized (connectionLock) {
            if (rdmaConnection != null) {
                try {
                    rdmaConnection.close();

   * gigantic heap, in which case we scale by heap size.
   */
  private static long timeoutSeconds() {
    // This class can make no hard guarantees.  The methods in this class are inherently flaky, but
    // we try hard to make them robust in practice.  We could additionally try to add in a system
    // load timeout multiplier.  Or we could try to use a CPU time bound instead of wall clock time

   * gigantic heap, in which case we scale by heap size.
   */
  private static long timeoutSeconds() {
    // This class can make no hard guarantees.  The methods in this class are inherently flaky, but
    // we try hard to make them robust in practice.  We could additionally try to add in a system
    // load timeout multiplier.  Or we could try to use a CPU time bound instead of wall clock time

   */
  /*
   * The new array contains nulls, even if the old array did not. If we wanted to be accurate, we
   * would declare a return type of `@Nullable T[]`. However, we've decided not to think too hard
   * about arrays for now, as they're a mess. (We previously discussed this in the review of
   * ObjectArrays, which is the main caller of this method.)
   */

    avatarUrl: https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9536869?u=652dd0d49717803c0cbcbf44f7740e53cf2d4892&v=4
    url: https://github.com/DMantis
  - login: hard-coders
    avatarUrl: https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9651103?u=95db33927bbff1ed1c07efddeb97ac2ff33068ed&v=4
    url: https://github.com/hard-coders
  - login: supdann
    avatarUrl: https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9986994?u=9671810f4ae9504c063227fee34fd47567ff6954&v=4

   */
  /*
   * The new array contains nulls, even if the old array did not. If we wanted to be accurate, we
   * would declare a return type of `@Nullable T[]`. However, we've decided not to think too hard
   * about arrays for now, as they're a mess. (We previously discussed this in the review of
   * ObjectArrays, which is the main caller of this method.)
   */