if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
                logger.debug("Failed to process a scroll request.", e);
            }
            writeJsonResponse(HttpServletResponse.SC_BAD_REQUEST, e);
        } catch (final Exception e) {
            if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
                logger.debug("Failed to process a scroll request.", e);
            }

This is still true.

So, to be able to have **multiple processes** at the same time, there has to be a **single process listening on a port** that then transmits the communication to each worker process in some way.

### Memory per Process { #memory-per-process }

        return resultBuf.toString();

    }

    /**
     * Executes the thumbnail generator process.
     * Sets up the classpath, JVM options, and command line arguments
     * to launch the ThumbnailGenerator in a separate process.
     *
     * @throws JobProcessingException if the thumbnail generation process fails
     */
    protected void executeThumbnailGenerator() {

        ResultData target = resultData;
        for (final Ingester ingester : ingestFactory.getIngesters()) {
            try {
                target = ingester.process(target, responseData);
            } catch (final Exception e) {
                logger.warn("Failed to process Ingest[{}]", ingester.getClass().getSimpleName(), e);
            }
        }
        return target;
    }

    }

    /**
     * Executes the crawler process in a separate JVM.
     * This method constructs the command line arguments, sets up the classpath,
     * and launches the crawler as an external process. It handles process lifecycle,
     * monitors output, and ensures proper cleanup.
     *
     * @throws JobProcessingException if the crawler process fails or times out
     */
    protected void executeCrawler() {

            restrictions.add(restriction);
            upperBound = restriction.getUpperBound();

            process = process.substring(index + 1).trim();

            if (process.startsWith(",")) {
                process = process.substring(1).trim();
            }
        }

        if (!process.isEmpty()) {
            if (!restrictions.isEmpty()) {
                throw new InvalidVersionSpecificationException(

        public ProcessCpuObj cpu;
        /** Virtual memory statistics for the process. */
        public ProcessVirtualMemoryObj virtualMemory;
    }

    /**
     * Data transfer object representing process file descriptor statistics.
     */
    public static class ProcessFileDescriptorObj {
        /**
         * Default constructor.
         */
        public ProcessFileDescriptorObj() {

        } catch (final Exception e) {
            logger.warn("Failed to load path mappings.", e);
        }
        return 0;
    }

    /**
     * Gets the list of process types.
     *
     * @return the list of process types
     */
    protected List<String> getProcessTypeList() {
        final List<String> ptList = new ArrayList<>();
        final String executeType = System.getProperty("lasta.env");

        assertTrue(result.contains("Python Process terminated."));
    }

    // Test execute with timeout
    public void test_execute_withTimeout() {
        pythonJob.filename("timeout.py");
        pythonJob.timeout = 60; // Set timeout
        pythonJob.processTimeout = true;

        testProcessHelper.exitValue = -1;
        testProcessHelper.processOutput = "Process terminated";

  }

  /**
   * This test creates a long random sequence of inputs, then a lot of differently configured sinks
   * process it; all should produce the same answer, the only difference should be the number of
   * process()/processRemaining() invocations, due to alignment.
   */
  @AndroidIncompatible // slow. TODO(cpovirk): Maybe just reduce iterations under Android.