tops = tops[:0]
		var topSig xlMetaV2VersionHeader
		consistent := true // Are all signatures consistent (shortcut)
		for _, vers := range versions {
			if len(vers) == 0 {
				consistent = false
				continue
			}
			ver := vers[0]
			if len(tops) == 0 {
				consistent = true
				topSig = ver.header
			} else {
				consistent = consistent && ver.header == topSig
			}
			tops = append(tops, vers[0])

   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [1.0] < [1.0, 2.0] < [2.0]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(double[],
   * double[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<double[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

then <i>A</i> is synchronized before <i>B</i>.
All the atomic operations executed in a program behave as though executed
in some sequentially consistent order.
</p>

<p>
The preceding definition has the same semantics as C++’s sequentially consistent atomics
and Java’s <code>volatile</code> variables.
</p>

<h3 id="finalizer">Finalizers</h3>

<p>

 * detailed at {@link ImmutableCollection}.
 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> as with any sorted collection, you are strongly advised not to use a {@link
 * Comparator} or {@link Comparable} type whose comparison behavior is <i>inconsistent with
 * equals</i>. That is, {@code a.compareTo(b)} or {@code comparator.compare(a, b)} should equal zero
 * <i>if and only if</i> {@code a.equals(b)}. If this advice is not followed, the resulting

    /**
     * Number of updates that alter the size of the table. This is used during bulk-read methods to
     * make sure they see a consistent snapshot: If modCounts change during a traversal of segments
     * computing size or checking containsValue, then we might have an inconsistent view of state so
     * (usually) must retry.
     */
    int modCount;

    /**

   * example, {@code [] < [1L] < [1L, 2L] < [2L]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(long[],
   * long[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<long[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

			metaArr[index].ModTime = modTime
			metaArr[index].VersionID = versionID
			if !metaArr[index].InlineData() {
				// If the data is not inlined, we may end up incorrectly
				// inlining the data here, that leads to an inconsistent
				// situation where some objects are were not inlined
				// were now inlined, make sure to `nil` the Data such
				// that xl.meta is written as expected.
				metaArr[index].Data = nil
			}

    /**
     * Number of updates that alter the size of the table. This is used during bulk-read methods to
     * make sure they see a consistent snapshot: If modCounts change during a traversal of segments
     * computing size or checking containsValue, then we might have an inconsistent view of state so
     * (usually) must retry.
     */
    int modCount;

    /**

> open connections to the database. This setting is generally NOT recommended as the behavior may be inconsistent during recursive deletes in `namespace` format.

				// only record the first register and arrangement
				firstReg = int(reg)
				nextReg = firstReg
				arrangement = curArrangement
			} else if curArrangement != arrangement {
				p.errorf("inconsistent arrangement in ARM64 register list")
			} else if nextReg != int(reg) {
				p.errorf("incontiguous register in ARM64 register list: %s", name)
			}
			regCnt++
			nextReg = (nextReg + 1) % 32