```
.
├── app
│   ├── __init__.py
│   ├── main.py
│   └── test_main.py
```

The file `main.py` would have:

{* ../../docs_src/async_tests/app_a_py310/main.py *}

The file `test_main.py` would have the tests for `main.py`, it could look like this now:

{* ../../docs_src/async_tests/app_a_py310/test_main.py *}

## Run it { #run-it }

You can run your tests as usual via:

You could load it at the top level of the module/file, but that would also mean that it would **load the model** even if you are just running a simple automated test, then that test would be **slow** because it would have to wait for the model to load before being able to run an independent part of the code.

You import it and create an "instance" the same way you would with the class `FastAPI`:

{* ../../docs_src/bigger_applications/app_an_py310/routers/users.py hl[1,3] title["app/routers/users.py"] *}

### *Path operations* with `APIRouter` { #path-operations-with-apirouter }

And then you use it to declare your *path operations*.

Use it the same way you would use the `FastAPI` class:

            Any,
            Doc(
                """
                The type to use for the response.

                It could be any valid Pydantic *field* type. So, it doesn't have to
                be a Pydantic model, it could be other things, like a `list`, `dict`,
                etc.

                It will be used for:

   * FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder.suppressing()}.
   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): or we could make HOLES_FORBIDDEN a feature. Or we could declare that
   * implementations are permitted to throw IAE if a hole is requested, and we could update
   * test*Hole to permit IAE. (But might this ignore genuine bugs?) But see the TODO above
   * testLower, which could make this all unnecessary
   */
  public static Method[] getHoleMethods() {

So, you could add additional data to the automatically generated schema.

For example, you could decide to read and validate the request with your own code, without using the automatic features of FastAPI with Pydantic, but you could still want to define the request in the OpenAPI schema.

You could do that with `openapi_extra`:

import jcifs.internal.smb2.rdma.RdmaMemoryRegion;

/**
 * DiSNI memory region implementation.
 *
 * This class would integrate with DiSNI to provide registered
 * memory regions for high-performance RDMA operations.
 *
 * Note: This is a skeleton implementation. A real implementation would
 * require proper DiSNI integration with actual memory registration.
 */
public class DisniMemoryRegion extends RdmaMemoryRegion {

<img src="/img/tutorial/extending-openapi/image03.png">

## Change the Theme { #change-the-theme }

The same way you could set the syntax highlighting theme with the key `"syntaxHighlight.theme"` (notice that it has a dot in the middle):

{* ../../docs_src/configure_swagger_ui/tutorial002_py310.py hl[3] *}

That configuration would change the syntax highlighting color theme:

<img src="/img/tutorial/extending-openapi/image04.png">

  - type: input
    id: package-path
    attributes:
      label: "What is the path of the package that you would like to have removed?"
      description: |
        We can remove packages with a shared path prefix.
        For example, a request for 'github.com/author' would remove all pkg.go.dev pages with that package path prefix.
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: package-owner

            Any,
            Doc(
                """
                The type to use for the response.

                It could be any valid Pydantic *field* type. So, it doesn't have to
                be a Pydantic model, it could be other things, like a `list`, `dict`,
                etc.

                It will be used for: