you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge
for this service if you wish); that you receive source code or can get
it if you want it; that you can change the software and use pieces of
it in new free programs; and that you are informed that you can do
these things.

  To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid

 *
 * Each entry is 4 bytes, and represents all the code points that share a 14-bit prefix. Entries are
 * sorted by this 14-bit prefix.
 *
 * We define these values:
 *
 *  * **b0b1s7**: (b0 << 14) + (b1 << 7)
 *  * **b2b3s2**: (b2 << 9) + (b3 << 2)
 *
 * b0b1s7 is the section prefix. If a section is omitted, that means its ranges data exactly matches
 * that of the preceding section.
 *

@GwtCompatible
final class SortedLists {
  private SortedLists() {}

  /**
   * A specification for which index to return if the list contains at least one element that
   * compares as equal to the key.
   */
  enum KeyPresentBehavior {
    /**
     * Return the index of any list element that compares as equal to the key. No guarantees are
     * made as to which index is returned, if more than one element compares as equal to the key.
     */

     * be retrieved with the Node Status request.
     *
     * The degree of state that an NbtAddress has is dependant on how it was
     * created and what is required of it. The second degree of state is the
     * most common. This is the state information that would be retrieved from
     * WINS for example. Natrually it is not practical for every NbtAddress

   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getAddNullSupportedMethod() {

   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getAddNullSupportedMethod() {

    // Verify the peer received what was expected.
    assertThat(peer.takeFrame().type).isEqualTo(Http2.TYPE_HEADERS)
    assertThat(peer.takeFrame().type).isEqualTo(Http2.TYPE_RST_STREAM)
  }

  /**
   * Confirm that the client times out if the server stalls after 3 bytes. After the timeout the
   * connection is still considered healthy while we await the degraded pong. When that doesn't

    /*
     * The entrySet() of ConcurrentHashMap, unlike that of other Map
     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-May/thread.html#17367
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users

     * extra state from AbstractFuture), our options are limited: A call to setException() would be
     * a no-op. We could log, but if that's what we really want, we should modify
     * AbstractFuture.executeListener to do so, since that method would have the ability to continue
     * to execute other listeners.
     *

@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public class AbstractListTester<E extends @Nullable Object> extends AbstractCollectionTester<E> {
  /*
   * Previously we had a field named list that was initialized to the value of
   * collection in setUp(), but that caused problems when a tester changed the
   * value of list or collection but not both.
   */
  protected final List<E> getList() {
    return (List<E>) collection;
  }

  /**