requestBody.writeTo(bufferedRequestBody)
          } else {
            // Write the request body if the "Expect: 100-continue" expectation was met.
            val bufferedRequestBody = exchange.createRequestBody(request, false).buffer()
            requestBody.writeTo(bufferedRequestBody)
            bufferedRequestBody.close()
          }
        } else {

 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
@Immutable
@Experimental
public interface InvokerRequest<O extends Options> {
    /**
     * The parser request this instance was created from.
     */
    @Nonnull
    ParserRequest parserRequest();

    /**
     * Shorthand for {@link Logger} to use.
     */
    default Logger logger() {
        return parserRequest().logger();
    }

 * under the License.
 */
package org.apache.maven.model.building;

import org.apache.maven.model.Model;

/**
 * Describes a problem that was encountered during model building. A problem can either be an exception that was thrown
 * or a simple string message. In addition, a problem carries a hint about its source, e.g. the POM file that exhibits
 * the problem.
 *

			// period. People depend on it being 0 I
			// guess. Maybe retry later. See Issue 18117.
		}
		// For client requests, Request.ContentLength of 0
		// means either actually 0, or unknown. The only way
		// to explicitly say that the ContentLength is zero is
		// to set the Body to nil. But turns out too much code
		// depends on NewRequest returning a non-nil Body,
		// so we use a well-known ReadCloser variable instead

  // smaller chunks of a very large result can ensure they see all possible objects. If objects are
  // updated during a chunked list the version of the object that was present at the time the first list
  // result was calculated is returned.
  optional int64 limit = 7;

  // The continue option should be set when retrieving more results from the server. Since this value is

         * original, identical JDK TypeVariable. By doing so, we sidestep the problem entirely.
         *
         * 2b. If the resolved types are different from the original types, things are trickier. The
         * only way to get a TypeVariable instance for the resolved types is to create our own. The
         * created TypeVariable will not interoperate with any JDK TypeVariable. But this is OK: We

func ParseWithStandardClaims(tokenStr string, claims *StandardClaims, key []byte) error {
	// Key is not provided.
	if key == nil {
		// keyFunc was not provided, return error.
		return jwtgo.NewValidationError("no key was provided.", jwtgo.ValidationErrorUnverifiable)
	}

	bufp := base64BufPool.Get().(*[]byte)
	defer base64BufPool.Put(bufp)

	tokenBuf := base64BufPool.Get().(*[]byte)

  private volatile ValueAndCloser<?> valueAndCloser;

  @Override
  protected void tearDown() throws Exception {
    super.tearDown();
    assertWithMessage("finishToValueAndCloserExecutor was shut down")
        .that(shutdownAndAwaitTermination(finishToValueAndCloserExecutor, 10, SECONDS))
        .isTrue();
  }

  public void testFinishToValueAndCloser_throwsIfCalledTwice() throws Exception {

    assert response.json() == "plumbus"


def test_fastapi_error(client: TestClient):
    with pytest.raises(FastAPIError) as exc_info:
        client.get("/items/portal-gun")
    assert "No response object was returned" in exc_info.value.args[0]


def test_internal_server_error():
    from docs_src.dependencies.tutorial008c_an import app

    client = TestClient(app, raise_server_exceptions=False)

    url: https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/discussions/categories/questions
  - name: Feature Request
    about: To suggest an idea or ask about a feature, please start with a question saying what you would like to achieve. There might be a way to do it already.
    url: https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/discussions/categories/questions
  - name: Show and tell
    about: Show what you built with FastAPI or to be used with FastAPI.