return null;
        } else if (Artifact.SCOPE_COMPILE.equals(scope) && Artifact.SCOPE_COMPILE.equals(inheritedScope)) {
            // added to retain compile artifactScope. Remove if you want compile inherited as runtime
            desiredScope = Artifact.SCOPE_COMPILE;
        }

        if (Artifact.SCOPE_TEST.equals(inheritedScope)) {
            desiredScope = Artifact.SCOPE_TEST;

                if (StringUtil.isBlank(regex)) {
                    logger.warn("Unknown regex pattern: {}", entity.getTerm());
                } else {
                    pair.getSecond().add(new Pair<>(Pattern.compile(regex), entity.getContent()));
                }
            } else {
                pair.getFirst().put(toLowerCase(entity.getTerm()), entity.getContent());
            }
        });

   *
   * <p><i>Notes:</i> This is an implementation of the algorithm for Lexicographical Permutations
   * Generation, described in Knuth's "The Art of Computer Programming", Volume 4, Chapter 7,
   * Section 7.2.1.2. The iteration order follows the lexicographical order. This means that the
   * first permutation will be in ascending order, and the last will be in descending order.
   *

            }

            /*
             *  If this project builds a shadow JAR than any unit tests should test against that artifact instead of
             *  compiled class output and dependency jars. This better emulates the runtime environment of consumers.
             */
            project.getPluginManager().withPlugin("com.github.johnrengelman.shadow", p -> {

# OAuth2 simple avec Password et Bearer { #simple-oauth2-with-password-and-bearer }

Construisons maintenant à partir du chapitre précédent et ajoutons les éléments manquants pour avoir un flux de sécurité complet.

## Obtenir `username` et `password` { #get-the-username-and-password }

Nous allons utiliser les utilités de sécurité de **FastAPI** pour obtenir `username` et `password`.

     * @param in the input stream to read the mapping data from
     */
    protected void reload(final MappingUpdater updater, final InputStream in) {
        final Pattern parsePattern = Pattern.compile("(.*?)\\s*+=>\\s*+(.*?)\\s*+$");
        final List<CharMappingItem> itemList = new ArrayList<>();
        try (BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(in, Constants.UTF_8))) {
            long id = 0;

</blockquote>

## Recherche { #investigation }

En utilisant toutes les alternatives précédentes, j'ai eu la chance d'apprendre de toutes, de prendre des idées, et de les combiner de la meilleure façon que j'ai pu trouver pour moi-même et les équipes de développeurs avec lesquelles j'ai travaillé.

Par exemple, il était clair que l'idéal était de se baser sur les annotations de type Python standard.

 *      <td>Flags this Mojo as requiring the dependencies in the specified scope (or an implied scope) to be
 *          resolved before it can execute.
 *          <br>
 *          <i>NOTE: Currently supports <b>compile</b>, <b>runtime</b>, and <b>test</b> scopes.</i>
 *      </td>
 *   </tr>
 *   <tr>
 *      <td>description</td>
 *      <td>none (detected)</td>
 *      <td>No</td>

                        || Artifact.SCOPE_PROVIDED.equals(nearestArtifact.getScope()))) {
            updateScope = true;
        }

        /* farthest is compile and nearest is not (has lower priority), change to compile */
        if (Artifact.SCOPE_COMPILE.equals(farthestArtifact.getScope())
                && !Artifact.SCOPE_COMPILE.equals(nearestArtifact.getScope())) {
            updateScope = true;

# Important: "tfrun foo | bar" is "( tfrun foo ) | bar", not "tfrun (foo | bar)".
# Therefore, "tfrun" commands cannot include pipes -- which is
# probably for the better. If a pipe is necessary for something, it is probably
# complex. Write a well-documented script under utilities/ to encapsulate the
# functionality instead.
tfrun() { "$@"; }

if [[ $(uname -s) = MSYS_NT* ]]; then
  source ./ci/official/utilities/windows.sh