* de la donnée soit envoyée par le client à travers le réseau
* de la donnée envoyée depuis votre programme soit reçue par le client à travers le réseau
* le contenu d'un fichier sur le disque soit lu par le système et passé à votre programme
* le contenu que votre programme a passé au système soit écrit sur le disque

            // When - simulate concurrent requests
            Thread thread1 = new Thread(() -> transportPool.getSmbTransport(context, address, DEFAULT_PORT, false));
            Thread thread2 = new Thread(() -> transportPool.getSmbTransport(context, address, DEFAULT_PORT, true));

            thread1.start();
            thread2.start();

      source: Buffer,
      byteCount: Long,
    ) {
      val toRead = minOf(remainingByteCount, byteCount)
      if (toRead > 0L) {
        source.read(buffer, toRead)
      }
      val toSkip = byteCount - toRead
      if (toSkip > 0L) {
        source.skip(toSkip)
      }
      remainingByteCount -= toRead
      receivedByteCount += byteCount
    }

    @Throws(IOException::class)

     *
     * @param task
     *            the task to execute
     */
    public static void execute(final Runnable task) {
        ForkJoinPool.commonPool().execute(() -> {
            final Thread currentThread = Thread.currentThread();
            final ClassLoader orignal = currentThread.getContextClassLoader();
            currentThread.setContextClassLoader(CommonPoolUtil.class.getClassLoader());
            try {

import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * The {@code ThreadSafe} annotation can be used to indicate a given type
 * is thread safe.  {@link Immutable} objects are automatically thread safe.
 *
 * @see Immutable
 * @see NotThreadSafe
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
@Experimental
@Documented
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.CLASS)
@Target(ElementType.TYPE)

     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-May/thread.html#17367
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users
     * to suppress (as we do now), stop testing entrySet().add() at all, make

/// info | Información

`Form` es una clase que hereda directamente de `Body`.

///

/// tip | Consejo

/**
 * A Ticker whose value can be advanced programmatically in test.
 *
 * <p>The ticker can be configured so that the time is incremented whenever {@link #read} is called:
 * see {@link #setAutoIncrementStep}.
 *
 * <p>This class is thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Jige Yu
 * @since 10.0
 */
@NullMarked
@GwtCompatible
public class FakeTicker extends Ticker {

 *
 * <p>Note that although your APIs should be liberal in what they accept, your methods which
 * <i>return</i> iterables should make every attempt to return ones of the robust variety.
 *
 * <p>This testing utility is not thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
@GwtCompatible
public final class MinimalIterable<E extends @Nullable Object> implements Iterable<E> {

  private var nextTcpConnectAtNanos = Long.MIN_VALUE

  /**
   * Plans currently being connected, and that will later be added to [connectResults]. This is
   * mutated by the call thread only. If is accessed by background connect threads.
   */
  private val tcpConnectsInFlight = CopyOnWriteArrayList<Plan>()

  /**
   * Results are posted here as they occur. The find job is done when either one plan completes