return arbitraryConstantInstanceOrNull(type);
    }
  }

  private static <T> @Nullable T arbitraryConstantInstanceOrNull(Class<T> type) {
    Field[] fields = type.getDeclaredFields();
    Arrays.sort(fields, BY_FIELD_NAME);
    for (Field field : fields) {
      if (Modifier.isPublic(field.getModifiers())
          && Modifier.isStatic(field.getModifiers())
          && Modifier.isFinal(field.getModifiers())) {

    //
    // 9) Execute AbstractLifecycleParticipant.afterProjectsRead(session)
    //
    // 10) Create ProjectDependencyGraph without trimming (as trimming was done in 7). A new topological sort is
    // required after the execution of 9) as the AbstractLifecycleParticipants are free to mutate the MavenProject
    // instances, which may change dependencies which can, in turn, affect the build order.
    //

import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkNotNull;
import static com.google.common.collect.ObjectArrays.checkElementsNotNull;
import static java.lang.System.arraycopy;
import static java.util.Arrays.sort;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import com.google.common.annotations.GwtIncompatible;
import com.google.common.annotations.J2ktIncompatible;
import com.google.errorprone.annotations.CanIgnoreReturnValue;

      return ImmutableList.of();
    }
    int[] stripes = new int[result.size()];
    for (int i = 0; i < result.size(); i++) {
      stripes[i] = indexFor(result.get(i));
    }
    Arrays.sort(stripes);
    // optimize for runs of identical stripes
    int previousStripe = stripes[0];
    result.set(0, getAt(previousStripe));
    for (int i = 1; i < result.size(); i++) {
      int currentStripe = stripes[i];

  }

  /** Sorts the given methods primarily by name and secondarily by number of parameters. */
  private static void sortMethods(Method[] methods) {
    Arrays.sort(
        methods,
        new Comparator<Method>() {
          @Override
          public int compare(Method m1, Method m2) {
            int nameComparison = m1.getName().compareTo(m2.getName());

            //  or QUALIFIERS.size and then resort to lexical ordering. Most comparisons are decided by the first
            // character,
            // so this is still fast. If more characters are needed then it requires a lexical sort anyway.
            return i == -1 ? (QUALIFIERS.size() + "-" + qualifier) : String.valueOf(i);
        }

        @Override
        public int compareTo(Item item) {
            if (item == null) {

* <a href="https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc+label%3Aquestion+-label%3Aanswered+" class="external-link" target="_blank">Problemach na GitHubie</a>

W wielu przypadkach możesz już znać odpowiedź na te pytania. 🤓

	for _, v := range entryMap {
		if stale {
			lockEntries = append(lockEntries, *v)
			continue
		}
		if len(v.ServerList) >= v.Quorum {
			lockEntries = append(lockEntries, *v)
		}
	}
	sort.Sort(lockEntries)
	return lockEntries
}

// PeerLocks holds server information result of one node
type PeerLocks struct {
	Addr  string
	Locks map[string][]lockRequesterInfo
}

Ohne ein Datenvalidierungssystem müssten Sie alle Prüfungen manuell im Code durchführen.

Für diese Funktionen wurde Marshmallow entwickelt. Es ist eine großartige Bibliothek und ich habe sie schon oft genutzt.

   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void sortDescending(char[] array, int fromIndex, int toIndex) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    checkPositionIndexes(fromIndex, toIndex, array.length);
    Arrays.sort(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
    reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code