* Returns the platform preferred map implementation that preserves insertion order when used only
   * for insertions.
   */
  static <K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
      Map<K, V> preservesInsertionOrderOnPutsMap() {
    return Maps.newLinkedHashMap();
  }

  /**
   * Returns the platform preferred map implementation that preserves insertion order when used only

   * perform better than its longhand equivalent, but should not perform worse.
   *
   * @since 12.0
   */
  HashCode hashInt(int input);

  /**
   * Shortcut for {@code newHasher().putLong(input).hash()}; returns the hash code for the given
   * {@code long} value, interpreted in little-endian byte order. The implementation <i>might</i>

   * may be false for some instances where the statistics are mathematically equal, including
   * instances constructed from the same values in a different order... or (in the general case)
   * even in the same order. (It is guaranteed to return true for instances constructed from the
   * same values in the same order if {@code strictfp} is in effect, or if the system architecture
   * guarantees {@code strictfp}-like semantics.)
   */
  @Override

   * perform better than its longhand equivalent, but should not perform worse.
   *
   * @since 12.0
   */
  HashCode hashInt(int input);

  /**
   * Shortcut for {@code newHasher().putLong(input).hash()}; returns the hash code for the given
   * {@code long} value, interpreted in little-endian byte order. The implementation <i>might</i>

   * Multimap#asMap()} will iterate through the keys in the order that they were first added to the
   * multimap, save that if all values associated with a key are removed and then the key is added
   * back into the multimap, that key will come last in the key iteration order.
   */
  public static MultimapBuilderWithKeys<@Nullable Object> linkedHashKeys() {

   * a.contains(v)}, but as the last two examples illustrate, the converse is not always true.
   *
   * <p>Being reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive, the {@code encloses} relation defines a
   * <i>partial order</i> over ranges. There exists a unique {@linkplain Range#all maximal} range
   * according to this relation, and also numerous {@linkplain #isEmpty minimal} ranges. Enclosure
   * also implies {@linkplain #isConnected connectedness}.

   * invoked in the same order as the underlying service enters those states. Additionally, at most
   * one of the listener's callbacks will execute at once. However, multiple listeners' callbacks
   * may execute concurrently, and listeners may execute in an order different from the one in which
   * they were registered.
   *

   * invoked in the same order as the underlying service enters those states. Additionally, at most
   * one of the listener's callbacks will execute at once. However, multiple listeners' callbacks
   * may execute concurrently, and listeners may execute in an order different from the one in which
   * they were registered.
   *

  /**
   * Creates a {@code LinkedBlockingQueue} with a capacity of {@link Integer#MAX_VALUE}, containing
   * the elements of the specified iterable, in the order they are returned by the iterable's
   * iterator.
   *
   * @param elements the elements that the queue should contain, in order
   * @return a new {@code LinkedBlockingQueue} containing those elements
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // LinkedBlockingQueue

		Dest:         dest,
	}

	stmt.Schema = s

	values := ConvertToCreateValues(stmt)
	expected := clause.Values{
		// column has value + defaultValue column has value (which should have a stable order)
		Columns: []clause.Column{{Name: "name"}, {Name: "email"}, {Name: "age"}, {Name: "id"}},
		Values: [][]interface{}{
			{"alice", "email", 18, 1},
			{"bob", "email", 19, 2},
		},
	}