* AbstractIteratorTester<E>.MultiExceptionListIterator. The runtime won't be able to verify
         * the AbstractIteratorTester<E> part, so it's an unchecked cast. We know, however, that the
         * only possible value for the type parameter is <E>, since otherwise the
         * MultiExceptionListIterator wouldn't be an Iterator<E>. The cast is safe, even though
         * javac can't tell.

 *       unnecessary; for example, {@code copyOf(copyOf(anArrayList))} should copy the data only
 *       once. This reduces the expense of habitually making defensive copies at API boundaries.
 *       However, the precise conditions for skipping the copy operation are undefined.
 *   <li><b>Warning:</b> a view collection such as {@link ImmutableMap#keySet} or {@link

 * error message template strings. This only supports the {@code "%s"} specifier, not the full range
 * of {@link java.util.Formatter} specifiers. However, note that if the number of arguments does not
 * match the number of occurrences of {@code "%s"} in the format string, {@code Verify} will still

 */
    public boolean equals( Object obj ) {

     * references (currently executing code, file descriptors).
     * 
     * Depending on the usage scenario, this may have some benefit as there won't be any delays for restablishing these
     * resources, however comes at the cost of having to properly release all SmbFile instances you no longer need.
     * 
     * @return whether to use strict resource lifecycle
     */
    boolean isStrictResourceLifecycle ();

// The API Server will fail validation of all requests that attempt to mutate
// the Data field. ControllerRevisions may, however, be deleted. Note that, due to its use by both
// the DaemonSet and StatefulSet controllers for update and rollback, this object is beta. However,
// it may be subject to name and representation changes in future releases, and clients should not

        .containsExactly(0, 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21)
        .inOrder();
  }

  public void testCopyOf_array_empty() {
    /*
     * We don't guarantee the same-as property, so we aren't obligated to test it. However, it's
     * useful in testing - when two things are the same then one can't have bugs the other doesn't.
     */
    assertThat(ImmutableIntArray.copyOf(new int[0])).isSameInstanceAs(ImmutableIntArray.of());
  }

        .containsExactly(0.0, 1.0, 3.0, 6.0, 10.0, 15.0, 21.0)
        .inOrder();
  }

  public void testCopyOf_array_empty() {
    /*
     * We don't guarantee the same-as property, so we aren't obligated to test it. However, it's
     * useful in testing - when two things are the same then one can't have bugs the other doesn't.
     */
    assertThat(ImmutableDoubleArray.copyOf(new double[0]))
        .isSameInstanceAs(ImmutableDoubleArray.of());

 * java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject AccessibleObject} and {@link
 * java.lang.reflect.GenericDeclaration GenericDeclaration}. Since version 31.0 that is no longer
 * the case. However, most methods from those types are present with the same signature in this
 * class.
 *
 * @param <T> the type that owns this method or constructor.

Delete marker replication is allowed in [AWS V1 Configuration](https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/storage/managing-delete-marker-replication-in-amazon-s3/) but not in V2 configuration. The MinIO implementation above is based on V2 configuration, however it has been extended to allow both DeleteMarker replication and replication of versioned deletes with the `DeleteMarkerReplication` and `DeleteReplication` fields in the replication configuration above. By default, this is set to `Disabled` unless...