case WILL_CREATE_VALUE_AND_CLOSER:
          throw new IllegalStateException(
              "Cannot call finishToFuture() after calling finishToValueAndCloser()");

        case WILL_CLOSE:
        case CLOSING:
        case CLOSED:
          throw new IllegalStateException("Cannot call finishToFuture() twice");

        case OPEN:
          throw new AssertionError();

  /**
   * Invoked when a {@code Future} computation fails or is canceled.
   *
   * <p>If the future's {@link Future#get() get} method throws an {@link ExecutionException}, then
   * the cause is passed to this method. Any other thrown object is passed unaltered.
   */
  void onFailure(Throwable t);

    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

    /**
     * Gets the problems that were encountered during the settings building. Note that only problems of severity
     * {@link BuilderProblem.Severity#WARNING} and below are reported here. Problems with a higher severity level cause
     * the settings builder to fail with a {@link SettingsBuilderException}.
     *
     * @return the problems that were encountered during the settings building, can be empty but never {@code null}
     */
    @Nonnull

    /**
     * Gets the problems that were encountered during the settings building. Note that only problems of severity
     * {@link BuilderProblem.Severity#WARNING} and below are reported here. Problems with a higher severity level cause
     * the settings builder to fail with a {@link ToolchainsBuilderException}.
     *
     * @return the problems that were encountered during the settings building, can be empty but never {@code null}
     */
    @Nonnull

     * @since 31.0
     */
    public ImmutableTable<R, C, V> buildOrThrow() {
      int size = cells.size();
      switch (size) {
        case 0:
          return of();
        case 1:
          return new SingletonImmutableTable<>(getOnlyElement(cells));
        default:
          return RegularImmutableTable.forCells(cells, rowComparator, columnComparator);
      }
    }

   *     cause loss of precision)
   */
  public void addAll(Iterable<? extends Number> values) {
    for (Number value : values) {
      add(value.doubleValue());
    }
  }

  /**
   * Adds the given values to the dataset.
   *
   * @param values a series of values, which will be converted to {@code double} values (this may
   *     cause loss of precision)
   */

    assertFailsWith<AssertionError> {
      testRule.afterEach(extensionContext)
    }.also { expected ->
      assertThat(expected).hasMessage("uncaught exception thrown during test")
      assertThat(expected.cause!!).hasMessage("boom!")
    }
  }

No exemplo anterior, como as classes eram diferentes, tivemos que usar o parâmetro `response_model`. Mas isso também significa que não temos suporte do editor e das ferramentas verificando o tipo de retorno da função.

Mas na maioria dos casos em que precisamos fazer algo assim, queremos que o modelo apenas **filtre/remova** alguns dados como neste exemplo.

 * and initializing on first use.
 *
 * We use this because eager classpath checks cause confusion and excessive logging in Android,
 * and we can't rely on classnames after proguard, so are probably best served by falling through
 * to a situation of trying our least likely noisiest options.
 */
class DeferredSocketAdapter(
  private val socketAdapterFactory: Factory,
) : SocketAdapter {