*       between paging memory and killing other processes - so allocating a gigantic buffer and
   *       then sequentially accessing it could result in other processes dying. This is solvable
   *       via madvise(2), but that obviously doesn't exist in java.
   *   <li>Ordinary copy. Kernel copies bytes into a kernel buffer, from a kernel buffer into a

    super(threadName);
    this.lockLikeObject = checkNotNull(lockLikeObject);
    start();
  }

  // Thread.stop() is okay because all threads started by a test are dying at the end of the test,
  // so there is no object state put at risk by stopping the threads abruptly. In some cases a test
  // may put a thread into an uninterruptible operation intentionally, so there is no other way to

There's a high chance that the logic for your *startup* and *shutdown* is connected, you might want to start something and then finish it, acquire a resource and then release it, etc.

Doing that in separated functions that don't share logic or variables together is more difficult as you would need to store values in global variables or similar tricks.

    List<E> expected = copyToList(getSampleElements());
    expected.addAll(index, elements);
    expectContents(expected);
  }

  /*
   * TODO: if we're testing a list, we could check indexOf(). (Doing it in
   * AbstractListTester isn't enough because many tests that run on lists don't
   * extends AbstractListTester.) We could also iterate over all elements to
   * verify absence
   */

"domain separation" bits and the first bit of // the padding. Sections 6.1 and 6.2 of [1] separate the outputs of the // SHA-3 and SHAKE functions by appending bitstrings to the message. // Using a little-endian bit-ordering convention, these are "01" for SHA-3 // and "1111" for SHAKE, or 00000010b and 00001111b, respectively. Then the // padding rule from section 5.1 is applied to pad the message to a multiple // of the rate, which involves adding a "1" bit, zero or more "0" bits, and // a final "1"...

    thread.joinSuccessfully(LONG_DELAY_MS);
    assertInterrupted();
  }

  public void testJoinTimeoutMultiInterruptExpired() {
    /*
     * We don't "need" to schedule a thread completion at all here, but by doing
     * so, we come the closest we can to testing that the wait time is
     * appropriately decreased on each progressive join() call.
     */
    TimedThread thread = TimedThread.createWithDelay(LONG_DELAY_MS);

 *   <li><b>Convenience methods:</b> These are implementations of common operations that are
 *       typically implemented by opening a reader using one of the methods in the first category,
 *       doing something and finally closing the reader that was opened.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Several methods in this class, such as {@link #readLines()}, break the contents of the source

 *   <li><b>Convenience methods:</b> These are implementations of common operations that are
 *       typically implemented by opening a reader using one of the methods in the first category,
 *       doing something and finally closing the reader that was opened.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Several methods in this class, such as {@link #readLines()}, break the contents of the source

- Each pool expects each host in this pool has the same number of drives specified as any other host.
- Mixing `local-path` and `distributed-path` is not allowed, doing so would cause MinIO to refuse starting the server.
- Ellipses and bracket notation (e.g. `{1...10}`) are allowed.

The most complex problem is building an authentication/authorization provider like those, but **FastAPI** gives you the tools to do it easily, while doing the heavy lifting for you.

///

## **FastAPI** utilities { #fastapi-utilities }