assertTrue(serviceAddr.startsWith("ncacn_ip_tcp:"));
        assertTrue(serviceAddr.contains("["));
        assertTrue(serviceAddr.contains("]"));
    }

    /**
     * Integration test that would require a real cluster environment.
     * Disabled by default - enable with -Dwitness.integration.test=true
     */
    @Test
    void testWitnessEnvironmentConfiguration() throws Exception {

    void testRefactoredEncryptionDecryption() throws Exception {
        // Given - Use same key for both encryption and decryption in test
        // In production, client would use clientEncKey/serverDecKey and server would use serverEncKey/clientDecKey
        Smb2EncryptionContext context = new Smb2EncryptionContext(EncryptionNegotiateContext.CIPHER_AES128_GCM, DialectVersion.SMB311,

    }

    @Test
    public void test_security_encodedPathTraversal() {
        // These are literal strings (not URL encoded at this point)
        // URL encoding would be handled before Base64 decoding
        assertEquals("fess.log", AdminLogAction.sanitizeFilename("fess.log"));
        assertEquals("%2e%2e/test.log", AdminLogAction.sanitizeFilename("%2e%2e/test.log"));
    }

   *   <li>{@code ImmutableList.of(2, "C")}
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>The result is guaranteed to be in the "traditional", lexicographical order for Cartesian
   * products that you would get from nesting for loops:
   *
   * {@snippet :
   * for (B b0 : lists.get(0)) {
   *   for (B b1 : lists.get(1)) {
   *     ...
   *     ImmutableList<B> tuple = ImmutableList.of(b0, b1, ...);

        assertEquals("actualValue", resultArray[1]);
    }

    /**
     * Test array index calculation correctness
     * This verifies the fix for the original bug where values[values.length - 1 + i]
     * would cause ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
     */
    @Test
    public void test_arrayIndexCalculation() {
        TestFessTransformer transformer = new TestFessTransformer();

       *
       * - rowEntry isn't cleared except below. If it was cleared below, then either
       *   columnIterator.remove() would have failed above (if the user hasn't called next() since
       *   then) or rowEntry would have been initialized by next() (as discussed above).
       */
      if (requireNonNull(rowEntry).getValue().isEmpty()) {
        rowIterator.remove();
        rowEntry = null;

    /*
     * Here's the order of events that we want.
     *
     * 1. The client thread begins to block on a get() call to a future.
     * 2. The client thread is interrupted sometime before the result would be
     *   available.
     * 3. We expect the client's get() to throw an InterruptedException.
     * 4. We expect the client thread's interrupt state to be false.
     * 5. The client thread again makes a blocking call to get().

  ContiguousSet<C> subSetImpl(
      C fromElement, boolean fromInclusive, C toElement, boolean toInclusive) {
    if (fromElement.compareTo(toElement) == 0 && !fromInclusive && !toInclusive) {
      // Range would reject our attempt to create (x, x).
      return new EmptyContiguousSet<>(domain);
    }
    return intersectionInCurrentDomain(
        Range.range(
            fromElement, BoundType.forBoolean(fromInclusive),

            // MID checking not required here as we only read responses for which we're waiting
            // We only read what we were waiting for, so first guess would be no.
            final boolean verify = dgst.verify(buffer, i, size, 0, this);
            this.verifyFailed = verify;
            return !verify;
        }
        return true;
    }

  @Override
  public final void run() {
    /*
     * Set runner thread before checking isDone(). If we were to check isDone() first, the task
     * might be cancelled before we set the runner thread. That would make it impossible to
     * interrupt, yet it will still run, since interruptTask will leave the runner value null,
     * allowing the CAS below to succeed.
     */
    Thread currentThread = Thread.currentThread();