testRotate(new float[] {1}, 0, 0, 1, new float[] {1});
    testRotate(new float[] {1}, 1, 0, 1, new float[] {1});
    testRotate(new float[] {1}, 1, 1, 1, new float[] {1});

    // Rotate the central 5 elements, leaving the ends as-is
    testRotate(new float[] {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, -6, 1, 6, new float[] {0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6});
    testRotate(new float[] {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, -1, 1, 6, new float[] {0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6});

    testRotate(new int[] {1}, 0, 0, 1, new int[] {1});
    testRotate(new int[] {1}, 1, 0, 1, new int[] {1});
    testRotate(new int[] {1}, 1, 1, 1, new int[] {1});

    // Rotate the central 5 elements, leaving the ends as-is
    testRotate(new int[] {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, -6, 1, 6, new int[] {0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6});
    testRotate(new int[] {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, -1, 1, 6, new int[] {0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6});

    testRotate(new float[] {1}, 0, 0, 1, new float[] {1});
    testRotate(new float[] {1}, 1, 0, 1, new float[] {1});
    testRotate(new float[] {1}, 1, 1, 1, new float[] {1});

    // Rotate the central 5 elements, leaving the ends as-is
    testRotate(new float[] {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, -6, 1, 6, new float[] {0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6});
    testRotate(new float[] {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, -1, 1, 6, new float[] {0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6});

	}

	var toRemove []string
	for k := range cleanMinioInternalMetadataKeys(m) {
		if stringsHasPrefixFold(k, ReservedMetadataPrefixLower) {
			// Do not need to send any internal metadata
			// values to client.
			toRemove = append(toRemove, k)
			continue
		}

		// https://github.com/google/security-research/security/advisories/GHSA-76wf-9vgp-pj7w

But still, FastAPI got quite some inspiration from Requests.

**Requests** is a library to *interact* with APIs (as a client), while **FastAPI** is a library to *build* APIs (as a server).

They are, more or less, at opposite ends, complementing each other.

Requests has a very simple and intuitive design, it's very easy to use, with sensible defaults. But at the same time, it's very powerful and customizable.

That's why, as said in the official website:

	// asserted the contents of the fetched object with the expected result.
	c.Assert(true, bytes.Equal(buffer2.Bytes(), []byte("hello world")))

	// Test the response when object name ends with a slash.
	// This is a special case with size as '0' and object ends with
	// a slash separator, we treat it like a valid operation and
	// return success.
	// The response Etag headers should contain Md5Sum of empty string.

This is the case for most of the web applications.

Many, many users, but your server is waiting 🕙 for their not-so-good connection to send their requests.

And then waiting 🕙 again for the responses to come back.

This "waiting" 🕙 is measured in microseconds, but still, summing it all, it's a lot of waiting in the end.

	} else {
		transitionLogIf(ctx, err)
	}

	// Now, delete object from hot-tier namespace
	if _, err := objectAPI.DeleteObject(ctx, oi.Bucket, oi.Name, opts); err != nil {
		return err
	}

	// Send audit for the lifecycle delete operation
	defer auditLogLifecycle(ctx, *oi, ILMExpiry, tags, traceFn)

	eventName := event.ObjectRemovedDelete
	if oi.DeleteMarker {
		eventName = event.ObjectRemovedDeleteMarkerCreated

		r, w := io.Pipe()
		// Make sure we close the pipe so blocked writes doesn't stay around.
		defer r.CloseWithError(context.Canceled)

		readers[i] = newMetacacheReader(r)
		d := disks[i]

		// Send request to each disk.
		go func() {
			var werr error
			if d == nil {
				werr = errDiskNotFound
			} else {
				werr = d.WalkDir(ctx, WalkDirOptions{
					Limit:          opts.perDiskLimit,

    // being resumed. To avoid a flake in this scenario, calculate how long that thread actually
    // waited and assert based on that time. Empirically, the race where the thread ends up waiting
    // for 5.5 seconds happens about 2% of the time.
    boolean longWait = NANOSECONDS.toSeconds(thread.timeSpentBlocked) >= 5;