import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.junit.runners.JUnit4;

/**
 * Unit test for {@link FinalizableReferenceQueue}.
 *
 * @author Bob Lee
 */
// - depends on details of GC and classloading
// - .class files aren't available
// - possibly no real concept of separate ClassLoaders?
@AndroidIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible
@RunWith(JUnit4.class)
@NullUnmarked
public class FinalizableReferenceQueueTest {

        }
    }

    /**
     * Returns the simple file name (without directory path) of this mapping file.
     *
     * @return the file name without the full path
     */
    public String getSimpleName() {
        return new File(path).getName();
    }

    /**
     * Updates the entire mapping file content from the provided input stream.
     *

 * nullness annotations in particular will outweigh the costs. (And it's worth noting that we have
 * released multiple ListenableFuture.class files that are not byte-for-byte compatible even from
 * the beginning, thanks to using different `-source -target` values for compiling our `-jre` and
 * `-android` "flavors.")
 *

    int FILE_WRITE_DATA = 0x00000002; // 2
    /** File append data access right */
    int FILE_APPEND_DATA = 0x00000004; // 3
    /** File read extended attributes access right */
    int FILE_READ_EA = 0x00000008; // 4
    /** File write extended attributes access right */
    int FILE_WRITE_EA = 0x00000010; // 5
    /** File execute access right */
    int FILE_EXECUTE = 0x00000020; // 6

                readParameterWordsWireFormat(buffer, bufferIndex + 4);

                /* The SMB_COM_NT_CREATE_ANDX response wordCount is wrong. There's an
                 * extra 16 bytes for some "Offline Files (CSC or Client Side Caching)"
                 * junk. We need to bump up the wordCount here so that this method returns
                 * the correct number of bytes for signing purposes. Otherwise we get a

///

/// warning

If you do this, you have to make sure each one of your *path operation functions* has a unique name.

Even if they are in different modules (Python files).

///

## Exclude from OpenAPI { #exclude-from-openapi }

  <span style="background-color:#009485"><font color="#D3D7CF"> FastAPI </font></span>  Starting production server 🚀

             Searching for package file structure from directories with
             <font color="#3465A4">__init__.py</font> files
             Importing from <font color="#75507B">/home/user/code/</font><font color="#AD7FA8">awesomeapp</font>

 * nullness annotations in particular will outweigh the costs. (And it's worth noting that we have
 * released multiple ListenableFuture.class files that are not byte-for-byte compatible even from
 * the beginning, thanks to using different `-source -target` values for compiling our `-jre` and
 * `-android` "flavors.")
 *

   * AbstractFutureState's private fields. However, our open-source build uses `-source 8 -target
   * 8`, so the class files from that build can't express nestmates. Thus, when those class files
   * are used from Java 9 or higher (i.e., high enough to trigger the VarHandle code path), such a
   * lookup would fail with an IllegalAccessException. That may then trigger use of Unsafe (possibly

	}()
	mr := msgp.NewReader(pr)
	defer readMsgpReaderPoolPut(mr)
	for {
		var file ReadMultipleResp
		if err := file.DecodeMsg(mr); err != nil {
			if errors.Is(err, io.EOF) {
				err = nil
			}
			pr.CloseWithError(err)
			return toStorageErr(err)
		}
		select {
		case <-ctx.Done():
			return ctx.Err()
		case resp <- file:
		}
	}
}

// CleanAbandonedData will read metadata of the object on disk