* <p>This test might fail in GWT because the GWT emulations might count on the input collection
   * not to change during the copy. It is safe to do so in GWT because javascript is
   * single-threaded.
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // GWT is single threaded
  public void testCopyOf_threadSafe() {
    /*
     * The actual collections that we pass as inputs will be wrappers around these, so

            return value == null || value.isEmpty();
        }

        /**
         * Returns a comparable value for a qualifier.
         * <p>
         * This method takes into account the ordering of known qualifiers then unknown qualifiers with lexical
         * ordering.
         * <p>
         *
         * @param qualifier

   * following conditions:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>You want to assign the same fraction of inputs to each bucket.
   *   <li>When you reduce the number of buckets, you can accept that the most recently added
   *       buckets will be removed first. More concretely, if you are dividing traffic among tasks,

          if (expectedMessage != null) {
            assertThat(expected).hasMessageThat().isEqualTo(expectedMessage);
          }
        }
      }
    },
    /*
     * This one comes last to work around b/367716565. (One *possible* alternative would be to not
     * declare any methods in this enum, converting assertFailsToDecode into a static method that is
     * implemented with a `switch`. I haven't tested that.)
     */

		// we instead let capacity get twice as large so we
		// don't spend all our time copying.
		copy(b.buf, b.buf[b.off:])
	} else if c > maxInt-c-n {
		panic(ErrTooLarge)
	} else {
		// Add b.off to account for b.buf[:b.off] being sliced off the front.
		b.buf = growSlice(b.buf[b.off:], b.off+n)
	}
	// Restore b.off and len(b.buf).
	b.off = 0
	b.buf = b.buf[:m+n]
	return m
}

        Reflection.newProxy(
            TypeVariable.class, new TypeVariableInvocationHandler(typeVariableImpl));
    return typeVariable;
  }

  /**
   * Invocation handler to work around a compatibility problem between Android and Java.
   *
   * <p>Java 8 introduced a new method {@code getAnnotatedBounds()} in the {@link TypeVariable}

   * desired count.
   *
   * @param element the element to add or remove occurrences of; may be null only if explicitly
   *     allowed by the implementation
   * @param count the desired count of the element in this multiset
   * @return the count of the element before the operation; possibly zero
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code count} is negative

    }

    private @Nullable Type captureNullable(@Nullable Type type) {
      if (type == null) {
        return null;
      }
      return capture(type);
    }
  }

  /**
   * Wraps around {@code TypeVariable<?>} to ensure that any two type variables are equal as long as
   * they are declared by the same {@link java.lang.reflect.GenericDeclaration} and have the same
   * name, even if their bounds differ.
   *

     *
     * @param ldapUser the LDAP user to retrieve roles for
     * @param bindDn the bind DN for LDAP connection
     * @param accountFilter the account filter pattern
     * @param groupFilter the group filter pattern
     * @param lazyLoading the lazy loading consumer for roles
     * @return an array of role names
     */

    void testGenerateMultipleNoncesNoCollision() {
        // Given
        int count = 10000; // Test with larger number for collision detection
        Set<String> nonceSet = new HashSet<>();

        // When
        for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
            byte[] nonce = encryptionContext.generateNonce();
            String nonceHex = bytesToHex(nonce);