public boolean isEmpty() {
    return delegateCollection().isEmpty();
  }

  @Override
  boolean isPartialView() {
    return delegateCollection().isPartialView();
  }

  /** Serialized form that leads to the same performance as the original list. */
  @GwtIncompatible
  @J2ktIncompatible
  private static final class SerializedForm implements Serializable {
    final ImmutableCollection<?> collection;

    @Test
    void testGetUserPrincipal() {
        // Act: Call the method under test
        Principal actualPrincipal = ntlmRequest.getUserPrincipal();

        // Assert: Verify that the returned principal is the same as the one provided in the constructor
        assertSame(mockPrincipal, actualPrincipal, "getUserPrincipal should return the principal object.");
    }

    /**

        @Test
        void arraysHaveSameLength() {
            assertEquals(WinError.WINERR_CODES.length, WinError.WINERR_MESSAGES.length,
                    "WINERR_CODES and WINERR_MESSAGES should have the same length");
        }

        @Test
        void messagesAlignWithCodes() {
            for (int i = 0; i < WinError.WINERR_CODES.length; i++) {
                int code = WinError.WINERR_CODES[i];

            // first one is known, so it comes first
            return -1;
        }
        int rv = Integer.compare(i1, i2);
        if (rv != 0) {
            return rv;
        }
        // same execution point, now compare priorities
        return Integer.compare(p1.priority(), p2.priority());
    }

   * the URL's host name. Note that concurrent requests to a single IP address may still exceed this
   * limit: multiple hostnames may share an IP address or be routed through the same HTTP proxy.
   *
   * If more than [maxRequestsPerHost] requests are in flight when this is invoked, those requests
   * will remain in flight.
   *
   * WebSocket connections to hosts **do not** count against this limit.

		&Account{Number: "account-slice-append-2"},
		&Account{Number: "account-slice-append-3"},
	)

	AssertAssociationCount(t, users, "Account", 3, "After Append")

	// Replace -> same as append

	// Delete
	if err := DB.Model(&users).Association("Account").Delete(&users[0].Account); err != nil {
		t.Errorf("no error should happened when deleting account, but got %v", err)
	}

      HashFunction hasher = Hashing.goodFastHash(i);
      assertThat(hasher.bits()).isAtLeast(i);
      HashTestUtils.assertInvariants(hasher);
    }
  }

  // goodFastHash(32) uses Murmur3_32. Use the same epsilon bounds.
  public void testGoodFastHash32() {
    HashTestUtils.check2BitAvalanche(Hashing.goodFastHash(32), 250, 0.20);
    HashTestUtils.checkAvalanche(Hashing.goodFastHash(32), 250, 0.17);

     * server address, the canonical representation of the URL, and does not
     * compare authentication information. In essance, two
     * <code>SmbFile</code> objects that refer to
     * the same file should generate the same hashcode provided it is possible
     * to make such a determination.
     *
     * @return  A hashcode for this abstract file
     */

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {

    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see
    https://groups.google.com/g/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c/CqYH59Dt_rQ/m/uVGW1QdUsXUJ
    for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.

 * task should not be executed again. Otherwise it returns a delay until the next execution.
 *
 * A task has at most one next execution. If the same task instance is scheduled multiple times, the
 * earliest one wins. This applies to both executions scheduled with [TaskRunner.Queue.schedule] and
 * those implied by the returned execution delay.
 *
 * Cancellation