* next} field is lazily initialized. The type of that field would be {@code @Nullable T}, and the
   * code would be responsible for populating a "real" {@code T} (which might still be the value
   * {@code null}!) before returning it to callers. Depending on how the code is structured, a
   * nullness analysis might not understand that the field has been populated. To avoid that problem

   * next} field is lazily initialized. The type of that field would be {@code @Nullable T}, and the
   * code would be responsible for populating a "real" {@code T} (which might still be the value
   * {@code null}!) before returning it to callers. Depending on how the code is structured, a
   * nullness analysis might not understand that the field has been populated. To avoid that problem

that traffic to the Waypoint proxy **after** applying any `TRANSPORT` layer policies (i.e. `Authorization`s). Thus, if the destination workload has at least the equivalent of a `STRICT` `PeerAuthentication`, unauthenticated traffic will be rejected before it reaches the Waypoint proxy. If the effective policy is `PERMISSIVE` (the default), the ztunnel will open a vanilla TLS HBONE tunnel (NOTE: this is not mTLS) to the Waypoint proxy and forward the traffic over that connection without presenting a...

    attributes:
      value: >
        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this enhancement in a real-world scenario, or does
        it just seem like a sensible behavior for the feature to have?


        Before we make significant changes to existing features in Guava, we really want to be sure
        that it's for a use case that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the

///

### Editor support

All the framework was designed to be easy and intuitive to use, all the decisions were tested on multiple editors even before starting development, to ensure the best development experience.

	if transport == nil {
		// when transport is nil, it means we are just validating the
		// inputs not performing any network calls.
		return cfg, nil
	}

	// Make sure to clone the transport before editing the ProxyURL
	if proxyURL != nil {
		ctransport := transport.(*http.Transport).Clone()
		ctransport.Proxy = http.ProxyURL((*url.URL)(proxyURL))
		cfg.transport = ctransport
	} else {

 *   <li>NullAway, which will <a
 *       href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6126#issuecomment-1204399671">treat it
 *       identically to {@code Nullable} as of version 0.9.9</a>. To treat it that way before then,
 *       you can set {@code
 *       -XepOpt:NullAway:CustomNullableAnnotations=com.google.common.base.ParametricNullness,...,com.google.common.util.concurrent.ParametricNullness},

 *   <li>NullAway, which will <a
 *       href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6126#issuecomment-1204399671">treat it
 *       identically to {@code Nullable} as of version 0.9.9</a>. To treat it that way before then,
 *       you can set {@code
 *       -XepOpt:NullAway:CustomNullableAnnotations=com.google.common.base.ParametricNullness,...,com.google.common.util.concurrent.ParametricNullness},

 *   <li>NullAway, which will <a
 *       href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6126#issuecomment-1204399671">treat it
 *       identically to {@code Nullable} as of version 0.9.9</a>. To treat it that way before then,
 *       you can set {@code
 *       -XepOpt:NullAway:CustomNullableAnnotations=com.google.common.base.ParametricNullness,...,com.google.common.util.concurrent.ParametricNullness},

 *   <li>NullAway, which will <a
 *       href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6126#issuecomment-1204399671">treat it
 *       identically to {@code Nullable} as of version 0.9.9</a>. To treat it that way before then,
 *       you can set {@code
 *       -XepOpt:NullAway:CustomNullableAnnotations=com.google.common.base.ParametricNullness,...,com.google.common.util.concurrent.ParametricNullness},