final int bufferSize, final Consumer<String> outputCallback) {
        final ProcessBuilder pb = new ProcessBuilder(cmdList);
        pbCall.accept(pb);
        destroyProcess(sessionId);
        JobProcess jobProcess;
        try {
            jobProcess = new JobProcess(pb.start(), bufferSize, outputCallback);

    }

    // Test constructor with null config
    public void test_constructor_nullConfig() {
        try {
            new FessTimeResourceProvider(null);
            // Constructor may accept null, so test continues
            assertTrue(true);
        } catch (NullPointerException e) {
            // Expected if constructor validates input
            assertTrue(true);
        }
    }

            "No more connections can be made to this remote computer at this time because there are already as many connections as the computer can accept.",
            "Indicates a Windows NT Server could not be contacted or that objects within the domain are protected such that necessary information could not be retrieved.",

        /*
         * 2010 - We no longer try a Node Status to get the
         * hostname because apparently some servers do not respond
         * anymore. I think everyone post Windows 98 will accept
         * an IP address as the tconHostName which is the principal
         * use of this method.
         */
        if (this.hostName.isUnknown()) {
            return getHostAddress();
        }

            searchLog.setClientIp("192.168.1.1");
            searchLog.setSearchWord("test");
            searchLog.setRequestedAt(LocalDateTime.now());
            searchLogList.add(searchLog);
            entityListLambda.accept(searchLogList);
        }
    }

    private static class MockElevateWordBhv extends ElevateWordBhv {
        public List<ElevateWord> selectList(Consumer<Object> cbLambda) {

      }
      value = (value * radix) + digit;
    }

    return value;
  }

  /**
   * Returns the unsigned {@code long} value represented by the given string.
   *
   * <p>Accepts a decimal, hexadecimal, or octal number given by specifying the following prefix:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@code 0x}<i>HexDigits</i>
   *   <li>{@code 0X}<i>HexDigits</i>
   *   <li>{@code #}<i>HexDigits</i>

      this.expectedValuesPerKey = max(expectedValuesPerKey, 1);

      return this;
    }

    /**
     * By default, if we are handed a value collection bigger than expectedValuesPerKey, presize to
     * accept that many elements.
     *
     * <p>This gets overridden in ImmutableSetMultimap.Builder to only trust the size of {@code
     * values} if it is a Set and therefore probably already deduplicated.
     */

* Before the PR is applied, the new tests should fail.
* After applying the PR, the new tests should pass.
* Coverage should stay at 100%.
* If you see the PR makes sense, or we discussed it and considered it should be accepted, you can add commits on top of the PR to tweak it, to add docs, tests, format, refactor, remove extra files, etc.
* Feel free to comment in the PR to ask for more information, to suggest changes, etc.

        byte[] storedFileId = (byte[]) fileIdField.get(request);
        assertArrayEquals(testFileId, storedFileId);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Constructor with null file ID should accept null")
    void testConstructorWithNullFileId() {
        // Should not throw exception
        Smb2FlushRequest requestWithNull = new Smb2FlushRequest(mockConfig, null);
        assertNotNull(requestWithNull);
    }

        // When pointer is 0, the string should be null
        PacUnicodeString unicodeString = new PacUnicodeString((short) 0, (short) 0, 0);

        // check() expects null when pointer is 0 but doesn't accept empty string
        assertThrows(PACDecodingException.class, () -> {
            unicodeString.check("");
        });

        // The implementation has a bug - it doesn't handle null properly