T extends @Nullable Object, A extends @Nullable Object, R extends @Nullable Object> {
  /**
   * Creates a {@code CollectorTester} for the specified {@code Collector}. The result of the {@code
   * Collector} will be compared to the expected value using {@link Object#equals}.
   */
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object, A extends @Nullable Object, R extends @Nullable Object>
      CollectorTester<T, A, R> of(Collector<T, A, R> collector) {

    void sign(byte[] data, int offset, int length, CommonServerMessageBlock request, CommonServerMessageBlock response);

    /**
     * Performs MAC signature verification. This calculates the signature
     * of the SMB and compares it to the signature field on the SMB itself.
     *
     * @param data
     *            The data.
     * @param offset
     *            The starting offset at which the SMB header begins.
     * @param length

* 📝 Simplify example for docs for Additional Responses, remove unnecessary `else`. PR [#4693](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/4693) by [@adriangb](https://github.com/adriangb).
* 📝 Update docs, compare enums with identity instead of equality. PR [#4905](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/4905) by [@MicaelJarniac](https://github.com/MicaelJarniac).

You can combine normal FastAPI *path operations* with GraphQL on the same application.

/// tip

**GraphQL** solves some very specific use cases.

It has **advantages** and **disadvantages** when compared to common **web APIs**.

Make sure you evaluate if the **benefits** for your use case compensate the **drawbacks**. 🤓

///

## GraphQL Libraries { #graphql-libraries }

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Benchmarks for {@link CharStreams#copy}.
 *
 * <p>{@link CharStreams#copy} has type specific optimizations for various common Appendable and
 * Reader implementations, this compares the performance of the different options.
 */
// These benchmarks allocate a lot of data so use a large heap
@VmOptions({"-Xms12g", "-Xmx12g", "-d64"})
@NullUnmarked
public class CharStreamsCopyBenchmark {

  /** Returns {@code true} if the table contains no mappings. */
  boolean isEmpty();

  /** Returns the number of row key / column key / value mappings in the table. */
  int size();

  /**
   * Compares the specified object with this table for equality. Two tables are equal when their
   * cell views, as returned by {@link #cellSet}, are equal.
   */
  @Override
  boolean equals(@Nullable Object obj);

  /**

  /**
   * Returns an unmodifiable map describing keys that appear in both maps, but with different
   * values.
   */
  Map<K, ValueDifference<V>> entriesDiffering();

  /**
   * Compares the specified object with this instance for equality. Returns {@code true} if the
   * given object is also a {@code MapDifference} and the values returned by the {@link

   * this map with the more specific generic type {@code Map<K, List<V>>}, call {@link
   * Multimaps#asMap(ListMultimap)} instead.
   */
  @Override
  Map<K, Collection<V>> asMap();

  /**
   * Compares the specified object to this multimap for equality.
   *
   * <p>Two {@code ListMultimap} instances are equal if, for each key, they contain the same values

   * this map with the more specific generic type {@code Map<K, List<V>>}, call {@link
   * Multimaps#asMap(ListMultimap)} instead.
   */
  @Override
  Map<K, Collection<V>> asMap();

  /**
   * Compares the specified object to this multimap for equality.
   *
   * <p>Two {@code ListMultimap} instances are equal if, for each key, they contain the same values

   * <p>The {@link OutputStream} should not be written to before or after the hand-off.
   */
  // TODO(user): Evaluate whether it makes sense to always piggyback the computation of a
  // HashCode on an existing OutputStream, compared to creating a separate OutputStream that could
  // be (optionally) be combined with another if needed (with something like
  // MultiplexingOutputStream).
  public HashingOutputStream(HashFunction hashFunction, OutputStream out) {