* Public or private harassment
* Publishing others' private information, such as a physical or email
  address, without their explicit permission
* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
  professional setting

## Enforcement Responsibilities

Community leaders are responsible for clarifying and enforcing our standards of

      // It is possible due to races that we are currently in the expected state even though we
      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.
      throw new TimeoutException("Timed out waiting for " + this + " to reach the RUNNING state.");
    }
  }

	set ACTIVATOR_HOME=!ACTIVATOR_HOME:~0,-1!
)

set ERROR_CODE=0
set APP_VERSION=1.3.2
set ACTIVATOR_LAUNCH_JAR=activator-launch-%APP_VERSION%.jar

rem Detect if we were double clicked, although theoretically A user could
rem manually run cmd /c
for %%x in (%cmdcmdline%) do if %%~x==/c set DOUBLECLICKED=1

rem FIRST we load a config file of extra options (if there is one)
set "CFG_FILE_HOME=%UserProfile%\.activator\activatorconfig.txt"

    /*
     * Even though it's weird to pass a defaultValue that is null, some callers do so. Those who
     * pass a literal "null" should probably just use `get`, but I would expect other callers to
     * pass an expression that *might* be null. This could happen with:
     *
     * - a `getFooOrDefault(@CheckForNull Foo defaultValue)` method that returns
     *   `map.getOrDefault(FOO_KEY, defaultValue)`
     *

   *
   * <p>Note that a method may still be effectively "final", or non-overridable when it has no
   * {@code final} keyword. For example, it could be private, or it could be declared by a final
   * class. To tell whether a method is overridable, use {@link Invokable#isOverridable}.
   */
  public final boolean isFinal() {
    return Modifier.isFinal(getModifiers());
  }

 * <li>success with warnings - model field + non-error model problems
 * <li>error - no model, but diagnostics
 * <li>error - (partial) model and diagnostics
 * </ol>
 * Could encode these variants as subclasses, but kept in one for now
 *
 * @param <T> the model type
 * @deprecated use {@link org.apache.maven.api.services.ModelBuilder} instead
 */
@Deprecated(since = "4.0.0")

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~

      }
    }

    @Override
    public CharSource asCharSource(Charset charset) {
      if (options.length == 0) {
        // If no OpenOptions were passed, delegate to Files.lines, which could have performance
        // advantages. (If OpenOptions were passed we can't, because Files.lines doesn't have an
        // overload taking OpenOptions, meaning we can't guarantee the same behavior w.r.t. things

      }
    }

    @Override
    public CharSource asCharSource(Charset charset) {
      if (options.length == 0) {
        // If no OpenOptions were passed, delegate to Files.lines, which could have performance
        // advantages. (If OpenOptions were passed we can't, because Files.lines doesn't have an
        // overload taking OpenOptions, meaning we can't guarantee the same behavior w.r.t. things

                 * guess most clients only support non-unicode so
                 * they don't run into this.
                 */
    
    /* UPDATE: Maybe not! Could this be a Unicode alignment issue. I hope
     * so. We cannot just comment out this method and use readString of
     * ServerMessageBlock.java because the arguments are different, however
     * one might be able to reduce this.