* support even a "normal" `TypeParameter<T>` when `<T>` has a nullable bound. (See the discussion
 * on TypeToken.where.) So, in the interest of failing fast and encouraging the user to switch to a
 * non-null bound if possible, let's require a non-null bound here.
 *
 * TODO(cpovirk): Elaborate on "wouldn't behave as users might expect."
 */
public abstract class TypeParameter<T> extends TypeCapture<T> {

  final TypeVariable<?> typeVariable;

import com.google.common.testing.SerializableTester;
import com.google.errorprone.annotations.CanIgnoreReturnValue;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Set;

/**
 * Variant of {@link SerializableTester} that does not require the reserialized object's class to be
 * identical to the original.
 *
 * @author Chris Povirk
 */
/*
 * The whole thing is really @GwtIncompatible, but GwtJUnitConvertedTestModule doesn't have a

 *  @author Victor Jonsson, http://victorjonsson.se
 *  @license MIT
 */

module github.com/minio/minio

go 1.22

require (
	cloud.google.com/go/storage v1.43.0
	github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azcore v1.14.0
	github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/azidentity v1.7.0
	github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go/sdk/storage/azblob v1.4.0
	github.com/IBM/sarama v1.43.3
	github.com/alecthomas/participle v0.7.1
	github.com/beevik/ntp v1.4.3
	github.com/buger/jsonparser v1.1.1
	github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2 v2.3.0

 *
 * Current implementation extracts these from the wrapper's API jars.
 * This is not correct as it should do this with the built distribution instead.
 *
 * Doing it correctly would require running a Gradle build with the full
 * distribution and extracting the generated api jar from its Gradle user home,
 * slowing down building documentation.
 *

  /*
   * Ideally, this class would have exposed only constructors that require a non-null cause. See
   * https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify-reference-checker/blob/61aafa4ae52594830cfc2d61c8b113009dbdb045/src/main/java/com/google/jspecify/nullness/NullSpecTransfer.java#L789
   * and https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/490.
   *
   * (Perhaps it should also have required that its cause was a RuntimeException. However, that

 *  @author Victor Jonsson, http://victorjonsson.se
 *  @license MIT
 */

  private var receivedPongCount = 0

  /** True if we have sent a ping that is still awaiting a reply. */
  private var awaitingPong = false

  init {
    require("GET" == originalRequest.method) {
      "Request must be GET: ${originalRequest.method}"
    }

    this.key = ByteArray(16).apply { random.nextBytes(this) }.toByteString().base64()
  }

module istio.io/istio

go 1.23

// Client-go does not handle different versions of mergo due to some breaking changes - use the matching version
replace github.com/imdario/mergo => github.com/imdario/mergo v0.3.5

require (
	cloud.google.com/go/compute/metadata v0.5.2
	github.com/AdaLogics/go-fuzz-headers v0.0.0-20240806141605-e8a1dd7889d6
	github.com/Masterminds/semver/v3 v3.3.0
	github.com/Masterminds/sprig/v3 v3.3.0

 *       a more precisely named annotation?
 *   <li>While a dependency on Android ought to be easy if it's for annotations only, it will
 *       probably require adding the dep to various ACLs, license files, and Proguard
 *       configurations, and there's always the potential that something will go wrong. It