```Python
{"id": id}
```

For example, with an ID of `42`, this would render:

```html
Item ID: 42
```

### Template `url_for` Arguments { #template-url-for-arguments }

You can also use `url_for()` inside of the template, it takes as arguments the same arguments that would be used by your *path operation function*.

So, the section with:

{% raw %}

```jinja

* Response payloads.

You would also have **inline errors** for everything.

And whenever you update the backend code, and **regenerate** the frontend, it would have any new *path operations* available as methods, the old ones removed, and any other change would be reflected on the generated code. 🤓

/// tip

This is how you would handle **passwords**. Receive them, but don't return them in the API.

You would also **hash** the values of the passwords before storing them, **never store them in plain text**.

///

The fields of `HeroCreate` are:

* `name`
* `age`

  public void testRemove_nullKeyQueriesUnsupported() {
    try {
      assertFalse(getMap().remove(null, v3()));
    } catch (NullPointerException tolerated) {
      // since the operation would be a no-op, the exception is not required
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(value = SUPPORTS_REMOVE, absent = ALLOWS_NULL_VALUE_QUERIES)
  public void testRemove_nullValueQueriesUnsupported() {

```
.
├── app
│   ├── __init__.py
│   ├── main.py
│   └── test_main.py
```

The file `main.py` would have:

{* ../../docs_src/async_tests/app_a_py39/main.py *}

The file `test_main.py` would have the tests for `main.py`, it could look like this now:

{* ../../docs_src/async_tests/app_a_py39/test_main.py *}

## Run it { #run-it }

You can run your tests as usual via:

For example, you could want to **return a dictionary** or a database object, but **declare it as a Pydantic model**. This way the Pydantic model would do all the data documentation, validation, etc. for the object that you returned (e.g. a dictionary or database object).

      // the operation would be a no-op, so exceptions are allowed but not required
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_PUT)
  public void testReplaceEntry_unsupportedAbsentKey() {
    try {
      getMap().replace(k3(), v3(), v4());
    } catch (UnsupportedOperationException tolerated) {
      // the operation would be a no-op, so exceptions are allowed but not required

It would also mean that if you get data from the `Request` object directly (for example, read the body) it won't be validated, converted or documented (with OpenAPI, for the automatic API user interface) by FastAPI.

Although any other parameter declared normally (for example, the body with a Pydantic model) would still be validated, converted, annotated, etc.

But every time we do:

```Python
Settings()
```

a new `Settings` object would be created, and at creation it would read the `.env` file again.

If the dependency function was just like:

```Python
def get_settings():
    return Settings()
```

we would create that object for each request, and we would be reading the `.env` file for each request. ⚠️

```Python
{
    "name": "Barz",
    "price": 3,
    "description": None,
}
```

because it doesn't include the already stored attribute `"tax": 20.2`, the input model would take the default value of `"tax": 10.5`.

And the data would be saved with that "new" `tax` of `10.5`.

## Partial updates with `PATCH` { #partial-updates-with-patch }