bs := h.Sum(nil)
		cred.ParentUser = base64.RawURLEncoding.EncodeToString(bs)
	}

	// Deny this assume role request if the policy that the user intends to bind
	// has a sts:DurationSeconds condition, which is not satisfied as well
	{
		p := policyName
		if p == "" {
			var err error
			_, p, err = globalIAMSys.GetRolePolicy(roleArnStr)
			if err != nil {
				writeSTSErrorResponse(ctx, w, ErrSTSAccessDenied, err)
				return

        </field>
        <field>
          <name>condition</name>
          <version>2.0.0+</version>
          <type>String</type>
          <description>
            The condition which must be satisfied to activate the profile.
          </description>
        </field>
      </fields>
    </class>

    <!-- TODO: reproduced from maven-model/maven.mdo, instead should inherit code and link to external docs -->

addition, we’ve introduced a new “soft” kind of node selector that is just a
hint to the scheduler; the scheduler will try to satisfy these requests but it
does not guarantee they will be satisfied. Both the “hard” and “soft” variants

  * Fix dynamic provisioning of PVs with inaccurate AccessModes by refusing to provision when PVCs ask for AccessModes that can't be satisfied by the PVs' underlying volume plugin. ([#47274](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/47274), [@wongma7](https://github.com/wongma7))

            The conditions within the build runtime environment which will trigger the
            automatic inclusion of the build profile. Multiple conditions can be defined, which must
            be all satisfied to activate the profile.

            <p>In addition to the traditional activation mechanisms (JDK version, OS properties,
            file existence, etc.), Maven now supports a powerful condition-based activation

func (p *ReplicationPool) ResizeLrgWorkers(n, checkOld int) {
	p.mu.Lock()
	defer p.mu.Unlock()

	if (checkOld > 0 && len(p.lrgworkers) != checkOld) || n == len(p.lrgworkers) || n < 1 {
		// Either already satisfied or worker count changed while we waited for the lock.
		return
	}
	for len(p.lrgworkers) < n {
		input := make(chan ReplicationWorkerOperation, 100000)
		p.lrgworkers = append(p.lrgworkers, input)

	// undefined.
	if !st.Mode().IsRegular() {
		file.Close()
		return nil, errIsNotRegular
	}

	if st.Size() < offset+length {
		// Expected size cannot be satisfied for
		// requested offset and length
		file.Close()
		return nil, errFileCorrupt
	}

	if offset > 0 {
		if _, err = file.Seek(offset, io.SeekStart); err != nil {
			file.Close()

* Fix dynamic provisioning of PVs with inaccurate AccessModes by refusing to provision when PVCs ask for AccessModes that can't be satisfied by the PVs' underlying volume plugin ([#47274](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/47274), [@wongma7](https://github.com/wongma7))

	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("Test %s: Failed to create HTTP request for RemoveBucketHandler: <ERROR> %v", instanceType, err)
	}
	// Since `apiRouter` satisfies `http.Handler` it has a ServeHTTP to execute the logic of the handler.
	// Call the ServeHTTP to execute the handler.
	apiRouter.ServeHTTP(rec, req)
	switch rec.Code {

  }

  @Override
  public Predicate<? super Entry<K, V>> entryPredicate() {
    return predicate;
  }

  @Override
  public int size() {
    return entries().size();
  }

  private boolean satisfies(@ParametricNullness K key, @ParametricNullness V value) {
    return predicate.apply(immutableEntry(key, value));
  }

  final class ValuePredicate implements Predicate<V> {
    @ParametricNullness private final K key;