* Mas ele fornece a você as ferramentas para construir aplicações _web_ simples, com roteamento baseado em caminhos, etc.
    * Se você quer fazer comparações com o Starlette, compare com Sanic, Flask, Django, etc. _Frameworks Web_ (ou _microframeworks_).
* **FastAPI**:

        ArtifactRepository rr2 = repositorySystem.createDefaultRemoteRepository();
        a2.setDependencyFilter(new ExcludesArtifactFilter(Arrays.asList("foo")));

        // sanity checks
        assertNotSame(a1, a2);
        assertNotSame(lr1, lr2);
        assertNotSame(rr1, rr2);

        DefaultMavenMetadataCache.CacheKey k1 =

import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertWithMessage;

import com.google.common.testing.AbstractPackageSanityTests;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Covers basic sanity checks for the entire package.
 *
 * @author Kurt Alfred Kluever
 */

@NullUnmarked
public class PackageSanityTests extends AbstractPackageSanityTests {

* **Starlette**:
    * Uvicorn 다음으로 좋은 성능을 발휘합니다. 사실 Starlette는 Uvicorn을 사용하여 실행됩니다. 따라서 더 많은 코드를 실행해야 하기 때문에 Uvicorn보다 "느려질" 수밖에 없습니다.
    * 하지만 경로 기반 라우팅 등 간단한 웹 응용 프로그램을 구축할 수 있는 도구를 제공합니다.
    * Starlette를 비교할 때는 Sanic, Flask, Django 등의 웹 프레임워크(또는 마이크로 프레임워크)와 비교하세요.
* **FastAPI**:
    * Starlette가 Uvicorn을 사용하므로 Uvicorn보다 빨라질 수 없는 것과 마찬가지로, **FastAPI**는 Starlette를 사용하므로 더 빠를 수 없습니다.

        <li>لیکن یہ آپ کو آسان ویب ایپلیکیشنز بنانے کے لیے ٹولز فراہم کرتا ہے، راستوں پر مبنی روٹنگ کے ساتھ، وغیرہ۔></li>
        <li>اگر آپ سٹارلیٹ کا موازنہ کر رہے ہیں تو اس کا موازنہ Sanic، Flask، Django وغیرہ سے کریں۔ ویب فریم ورکس (یا مائیکرو فریم ورکس)</li>
    </ul>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><b>FastAPI</b>:</li>
    <ul>

    if (element instanceof Entry) {
      Entry<?, ?> entry = (Entry<?, ?>) element;
      element = mapEntry(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
    }
    assertTrue(collection.contains(element)); // sanity check
    iterator.remove();
    assertFalse(collection.contains(element));
    assertEquals(originalSize - 1, collection.size());
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require({KNOWN_ORDER, SUPPORTS_ITERATOR_REMOVE})

    Function<String, @Nullable Integer> function = Functions.forMap(map, null);

    assertEquals((Integer) 1, function.apply("One"));
    assertNull(function.apply("Two"));

    // check basic sanity of equals and hashCode
    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(function)
        .addEqualityGroup(Functions.forMap(map, 1))
        .testEquals();
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible

        // Act
        AppConfigurationEntry[] entries = cfg.getAppConfigurationEntry("ignored");
        Map<String, ?> returned = entries[0].getOptions();

        // Assert: sanity check and verify that no mutating calls were made after construction
        assertEquals("true", returned.get("refreshKrb5Config"));
        verify(spyOpts, never()).put(any(), any());

    @NullSource
    @DisplayName("valueOf(null) throws NullPointerException")
    void valueOfRejectsNull(String input) {
        assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> RequestParam.valueOf(input));
    }

    // Sanity: Enum.valueOf(Class, String) behaves identically to RequestParam.valueOf(String)
    @Test
    @DisplayName("Enum.valueOf mirrors RequestParam.valueOf for valid names")
    void enumValueOfParity() {

Use Python types to have great editor support.

Have a powerful dependency injection system. Find a way to minimize code repetition.

///

### <a href="https://sanic.readthedocs.io/en/latest/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Sanic</a> { #sanic }

It was one of the first extremely fast Python frameworks based on `asyncio`. It was made to be very similar to Flask.

/// note | Technical Details