* href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6409434">JDK-6409434</a> is fixed. It's unclear
   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in set(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection

        when(mockDelegate.getMaximumVersion()).thenReturn(null);

        // When & Then - should handle nulls gracefully
        assertNull(delegatingConfig.getRandom(), "Should return null when delegate returns null");
        assertNull(delegatingConfig.getLocalAddr(), "Should return null when delegate returns null");
        assertNull(delegatingConfig.getNetbiosHostname(), "Should return null when delegate returns null");

				// Note: Duplicate Columns
				{Field: &schema.Field{Name: "Name8"}, Collate: "utf8"},
			},
		},
		{
			Class:  "UNIQUE",
			Name:   "idx_user_indices_idx_compname_1",
			Option: "NULLS NOT DISTINCT",
			Fields: []schema.IndexOption{
				{Field: &schema.Field{Name: "CompName1", NotNull: true}},
				{Field: &schema.Field{Name: "CompName2"}},
			},
		},
		{
			Name: "idx_user_indices_comp_id0",

   *
   * @param reference any array of the desired type
   * @param length the length of the new array
   */
  /*
   * The new array contains nulls, even if the old array did not. If we wanted to be accurate, we
   * would declare a return type of `@Nullable T[]`. However, we've decided not to think too hard

  }

  /*
   * All the ContiguousSet generators below manually reject nulls here. In principle, we'd like to
   * defer that to Range, since it's ContiguousSet.create() that's used to create the sets. However,
   * that gets messy here, and we already have null tests for Range.
   */

  /*
   * These generators also rely on consecutive integer inputs (not necessarily in order, but no

   *
   * @param reference any array of the desired type
   * @param length the length of the new array
   */
  /*
   * The new array contains nulls, even if the old array did not. If we wanted to be accurate, we
   * would declare a return type of `@Nullable T[]`. However, we've decided not to think too hard

    initThreeCopies();
    assertSetCountDecreasingFailure(e0(), 1);
  }

  // setCount with nulls:

  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = ZERO)
  @CollectionFeature.Require({SUPPORTS_REMOVE, ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES})
  public void testSetCount_removeNull_nullSupported() {
    initCollectionWithNullElement();
    assertSetCount(null, 0);
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(
      value = {SUPPORTS_ADD, ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES},

    @Test
    void testLsarDomainInfoEncodeDecodeWithNulls() throws NdrException {
        // Create a domain info with null fields
        lsarpc.LsarDomainInfo domainInfo = new lsarpc.LsarDomainInfo();
        domainInfo.name = new rpc.unicode_string();
        domainInfo.name.buffer = null;
        domainInfo.sid = null;

        // Encode to buffer
        byte[] buffer = new byte[1024];

   *             impossible.
   *         <li>Test will fail if the constructor or factory method throws exception.
   *       </ul>
   *   <li>If there is no non-private constructor or non-private static factory method declared by
   *       {@code cls}, instance methods are skipped for nulls test.

        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("verifyMIC throws on mismatch and nulls")
        void testVerifyMICThrows() throws Exception {
            DummySSPContext ctx = new DummySSPContext(new byte[] { 1 }, true, null, null, 0, true);
            byte[] data = new byte[] { 1, 2, 3 };
            byte[] wrongMic = new byte[] { 0 };