interface NestedType {
    Property<String> getSomeProperty()
}
class Example {
    Property<NestedType> getNestedProperty()
}
```

This is unnecessary because users will have trouble creating instances of `NestedType` and merging different instances of `NestedType`. It's also more awkward for users to access the properties in the nested property.

If the nested type is a managed type (Gradle can generate its implementation), you can define a nested property with:

* Review those pull requests, requesting changes or approving them. For the languages I don't speak, I'll wait for several others to review the translation before merging.

/// tip

					allAtEOF = false
				}
				errs[i] = err
			}(len(errs), set)
			errs = append(errs, nil)
		}
	}
	mu.Unlock()

	// Gather results to a single channel.
	// Quorum is one since we are merging across sets.
	err := mergeEntryChannels(ctx, inputs, results, 1)

	cancelList()
	wg.Wait()

	// we should return 'errs' from per disk
	if isAllNotFound(errs) {
		if isAllVolumeNotFound(errs) {

Along with caching, partial computations are a critical performance optimization to ensure that we do not need to build (or send) every resource to every proxy on every change. This is discussed more in the Config Serving section.

### Config Serving

Config serving is the layer that actually accepts proxy clients, connected over bidirectional gRPC streams, and serve them the required configuration.

## Merge Translation PRs

For Spanish, as I'm a native speaker and it's a language close to me, I will give it a final review myself and in most cases tweak the PR a bit before merging it.

For the other languages, confirm that:

* The title is correct following the instructions above.
* It has the labels `lang-all` and `lang-{lang code}`.

The binary compatibility check runs as a part of the broader sanity check.
The latter runs on every PR and is a prerequisite for merging.

If you run the sanity check locally with the `./gradlew sanityCheck`, you can see the binary compatibility error in the output.
It looks like the following:

```

// MatchCondition represents a condition which must be fulfilled for a request to be sent to a webhook.
message MatchCondition {
  // Name is an identifier for this match condition, used for strategic merging of MatchConditions,
  // as well as providing an identifier for logging purposes. A good name should be descriptive of
  // the associated expression.

   * input elements. Cells are inserted into the generated {@code Table} in encounter order.
   *
   * <p>If multiple input elements map to the same row and column, the specified merging function is
   * used to combine the values. Like {@link
   * java.util.stream.Collectors#toMap(java.util.function.Function, java.util.function.Function,

	objAPI := newObjectLayerFn()

	// We must have a global lock for this so nobody else modifies env while we do.
	defer env.LockSetEnv()()

	// Disable merging env values with config for validation.
	env.SetEnvOff()

	// Enable env values to validate KMS.
	defer env.SetEnvOn()
	if subSys != "" {
		return validateSubSysConfig(ctx, s, subSys, objAPI)
	}

   *
   * <p>If the mapped keys contain duplicates (according to {@link Object#equals(Object)}), the
   * values are merged using the specified merging function. If the merging function returns {@code
   * null}, then the collector removes the value that has been computed for the key thus far (though
   * future occurrences of the key would reinsert it).
   *