{
    "description": "TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. It has a comprehensive, flexible ecosystem of tools, libraries, and community resources that lets researchers push the state-of-the-art in ML and developers easily build and deploy ML-powered applications.",
    "license": "Apache-2.0",
    "title": "TensorFlow",
    "upload_type": "software",
    "creators": [
        {
            "name": "TensorFlow Developers"
        }

          + "risus tempor vehicula et a odio. Nam aliquet dolor viverra libero rutrum accumsan "
          + "quis in augue. Suspendisse id dui in lorem tristique placerat eget vel risus. Sed "
          + "metus neque, scelerisque in molestie ac, mattis quis lectus. Pellentesque viverra "
          + "justo commodo quam bibendum ut gravida leo accumsan. Nullam malesuada sagittis diam, "

 * }
 * }</pre>
 *
 * @author Ben Yu
 * @since 12.0
 */
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
/*
 * A nullable bound would let users create a TypeParameter instance for a parameter with a nullable
 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could

    constructorsSupplier.get().firstOrNull { c -> jvmSignature == c.signature?.toString() }?.let { predicate.match(it) } ?: false


private
fun hasFunctionAttribute(functionsSupplier: Supplier<MutableList<KmFunction>>, jvmSignature: String, predicate: AttributePredicate) =
    functionsSupplier.get().firstOrNull {
        jvmSignature == it.signature?.toString()
    }?.let { predicate.match(it) } ?: false


private

        Disposer.newDisposable().let { disposable ->
            ParsedKotlinFiles(disposable.parseKotlinFiles(sourceRoots, compilationClasspath), disposable)
        }

    private
    fun <T : Any?> withParsedKotlinSource(sourceRoots: List<File>, block: (List<KtFile>) -> T) =
        Disposer.newDisposable().use {
            parseKotlinFiles(sourceRoots, emptyList()).let(block)
        }

    private

            // If this CAS succeeds, we know that the provided callable will never be invoked,
            // so when oldFuture completes it is safe to allow the next submitted task to
            // proceed. Doing this immediately here lets the next task run without waiting for
            // the cancelled task's executor to run the noop AsyncCallable.
            //
            // ---
            //

    System.setErr(object : PrintStream(OutputStream.nullOutputStream()) {})
  }

  fun uninstall() {
    originalSystemOut.let {
      System.setOut(it)
    }
    originalSystemErr.let {
      System.setErr(it)
    }
  }

 * }
 * }</pre>
 *
 * @author Ben Yu
 * @since 12.0
 */
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
/*
 * A nullable bound would let users create a TypeParameter instance for a parameter with a nullable
 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could

            },
            file
        )
    }

    private
    fun getBuildTimestampAsString() =
        buildTimestamp.get().let { timestampFormat.format(it) }

    private
    fun getBuildTimestampAsIsoString() =
        buildTimestamp.get().let { isoTimestampFormat.format(it) }

    private
    fun Logger.logBuildVersion() {
        lifecycle(
            "Version: ${version.get()} " +

package org.apache.maven.execution.scope;

import org.apache.maven.execution.MojoExecutionEvent;
import org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException;

/**
 * Extension point that allows build extensions observe and possibly veto mojo executions.
 * <p>
 * Unlike {@link org.apache.maven.execution.MojoExecutionListener}, this extension point does not
 * trigger instantiation of the component, hence "weak" class name prefix. Only applies to mojo execution