*   <li>clearing weak references to unreachable referents
 *   <li>enqueuing weak references to unreachable referents in their reference queue
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>This class uses (possibly repeated) invocations of {@link java.lang.System#gc()} to cause
 * finalization to happen. However, a call to {@code System.gc()} is specified to be no more than a

    /**
     * Clones this resolver for usage in a forked resolution process. In general, implementors need not provide a deep
     * clone. The only requirement is that invocations of {@link #addRepository(Repository)} on the clone do not affect
     * the state of the original resolver and vice versa.
     *
     * @return The cloned resolver, never {@code null}.
     */

	// in a 16 disk Erasure setup. The original disks are 'replaced' with
	// naughtyDisks that fail after 'f' successful StorageAPI method
	// invocations, where f - [0,2)

	// Create "object" under "bucket".
	_, err = obj.PutObject(ctx, bucket, object, mustGetPutObjReader(t, bytes.NewReader(buf), int64(len(buf)), "", ""), opts)
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatal(err)
	}

   *     minValue()}
   */
  @CheckForNull
  public abstract C previous(C value);

  /**
   * Returns a signed value indicating how many nested invocations of {@link #next} (if positive) or
   * {@link #previous} (if negative) are needed to reach {@code end} starting from {@code start}.
   * For example, if {@code end = next(next(next(start)))}, then {@code distance(start, end) == 3}

	}
}

func (in *Input) Next() ScanToken {
	if in.peek {
		in.peek = false
		tok := in.peekToken
		in.text = in.peekText
		return tok
	}
	// If we cannot generate a token after 100 macro invocations, we're in trouble.
	// The usual case is caught by Push, below, but be safe.
	for nesting := 0; nesting < 100; {
		tok := in.Stack.Next()
		switch tok {
		case '#':
			if !in.beginningOfLine {

 *   <li>clearing weak references to unreachable referents
 *   <li>enqueuing weak references to unreachable referents in their reference queue
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>This class uses (possibly repeated) invocations of {@link java.lang.System#gc()} to cause
 * finalization to happen. However, a call to {@code System.gc()} is specified to be no more than a

    assertEquals(1, Queues.newLinkedBlockingQueue(1).remainingCapacity());
    assertEquals(11, Queues.newLinkedBlockingQueue(11).remainingCapacity());
  }

  /** Checks that #drain() invocations behave correctly for a drained (empty) queue. */
  private void assertDrained(BlockingQueue<Object> q) {
    assertNull(q.peek());
    assertInterruptibleDrained(q);
    assertUninterruptibleDrained(q);
  }

  /**
   * Returns a hash code for {@code t}.
   *
   * <p>The {@code hash} has the following properties:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>It is <i>consistent</i>: for any reference {@code x}, multiple invocations of {@code
   *       hash(x}} consistently return the same value provided {@code x} remains unchanged
   *       according to the definition of the equivalence. The hash need not remain consistent from

 *   networkService.send(packet);
 * }
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <p>It is important to note that the number of permits requested <i>never</i> affects the
 * throttling of the request itself (an invocation to {@code acquire(1)} and an invocation to {@code
 * acquire(1000)} will result in exactly the same throttling, if any), but it affects the throttling
 * of the <i>next</i> request. I.e., if an expensive task arrives at an idle RateLimiter, it will be

 *   networkService.send(packet);
 * }
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <p>It is important to note that the number of permits requested <i>never</i> affects the
 * throttling of the request itself (an invocation to {@code acquire(1)} and an invocation to {@code
 * acquire(1000)} will result in exactly the same throttling, if any), but it affects the throttling
 * of the <i>next</i> request. I.e., if an expensive task arrives at an idle RateLimiter, it will be