*
   * <p><b>Note:</b> if {@code first} is represented as an {@link Optional}, this can be
   * accomplished with {@link Optional#or(Object) first.or(second)}. That approach also allows for
   * lazy evaluation of the fallback instance, using {@link Optional#or(Supplier)
   * first.or(supplier)}.
   *
   * <p><b>Java 9 users:</b> use {@code java.util.Objects.requireNonNullElse(first, second)}
   * instead.
   *

      return bytes;
    }

    @Override
    boolean equalsSameBits(HashCode that) {
      // We don't use MessageDigest.isEqual() here because its contract does not guarantee
      // constant-time evaluation (no short-circuiting).
      if (this.bytes.length != that.getBytesInternal().length) {
        return false;
      }

      boolean areEqual = true;
      for (int i = 0; i < this.bytes.length; i++) {

	if !ok {
		return
	}
	r.ReplicationStatusInternal = rstatus
	r.Targets = replicationStatusesMap(rstatus)
	return
}

// SetEvalMetadataFn sets the metadata evaluation function
func (o *ObjectOptions) SetEvalMetadataFn(f EvalMetadataFn) {
	o.EvalMetadataFn = f
}

// SetEvalRetentionBypassFn sets the retention bypass function

## Proxy implementation

In its initial implementations, the ztunnel was actually implemented in 3 different ways: a bespoke Rust implementation, a bespoke Go implementation, and in Envoy.

In the end, [after evaluation](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c2123cKuYsBDpIon9FFdctWTUIMFweSjgwG7r8l3818/edit), the decision was to move forward with a Rust implementation.

   * operations like {@link Multimap#containsValue} and {@code Multimap.toString()}. For this to
   * perform well, {@code function} should be fast. To avoid lazy evaluation when the returned
   * multimap doesn't need to be a view, copy the returned multimap into a new multimap of your
   * choosing.
   *
   * @since 7.0
   */
  public static <

precision, and vice versa.
</p>


<h3 id="Order_of_evaluation">Order of evaluation</h3>

<p>
At package level, <a href="#Package_initialization">initialization dependencies</a>
determine the evaluation order of individual initialization expressions in
<a href="#Variable_declarations">variable declarations</a>.
Otherwise, when evaluating the <a href="#Operands">operands</a> of an
expression, assignment, or

defined as the partial order requirements set out by the <a href="/ref/spec">Go language specification</a>
for Go's control flow constructs as well as the <a href="/ref/spec#Order_of_evaluation">order of evaluation for expressions</a>.
</p>

<p>
A Go <i>program execution</i> is modeled as a set of goroutine executions,

   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> if {@code first} is represented as an {@link Optional}, this can be
   * accomplished with {@link Optional#or(Object) first.or(second)}. That approach also allows for
   * lazy evaluation of the fallback instance, using {@link Optional#or(Supplier)
   * first.or(supplier)}.
   *
   * <p><b>Java 9 users:</b> use {@code java.util.Objects.requireNonNullElse(first, second)}
   * instead.
   *

	Extract   *ExtractFunc   `parser:"| @@"`
	Trim      *TrimFunc      `parser:"| @@"`
	DateAdd   *DateAddFunc   `parser:"| @@"`
	DateDiff  *DateDiffFunc  `parser:"| @@"`

	// Used during evaluation for aggregation funcs
	aggregate *aggVal
}

// SimpleArgFunc represents functions with simple expression
// arguments.
type SimpleArgFunc struct {

However, the order of those events compared to the evaluation
and indexing of <code>x</code> and the evaluation
of <code>y</code> is not specified.
</p>

<pre>
a := 1
f := func() int { a++; return a }
x := []int{a, f()}            // x may be [1, 2] or [2, 2]: evaluation order between a and f() is not specified
m := map[int]int{a: 1, a: 2}  // m may be {2: 1} or {2: 2}: evaluation order between the two map assignments is not specified