are necessarily infringed by the use or sale of its Contribution alone
or when combined with the Program.

"Program" means the Contributions Distributed in accordance with this
Agreement.

"Recipient" means anyone who receives the Program under this Agreement
or any Secondary License (as applicable), including Contributors.

"Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source Code or other

# AssumeRoleWithClientGrants [![Slack](https://slack.min.io/slack?type=svg)](https://slack.min.io)

## Introduction

Returns a set of temporary security credentials for applications/clients who have been authenticated through client credential grants provided by identity provider. Example providers include KeyCloak, Okta etc.

                        </Array>
                    </mxGeometry>
                </mxCell>
                <mxCell id="100" value="&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: &amp;#34;roboto&amp;#34; ; font-size: 24px&quot;&gt;Who is: someapp.example.com&lt;/span&gt;" style="shape=hexagon;perimeter=hexagonPerimeter2;whiteSpace=wrap;html=1;fixedSize=1;strokeWidth=3;" parent="1" vertex="1">

 * FutureTask#done() done()} method. For similar functionality, call {@link #addListener}.
 *
 * <p>Few users should use this class. It is intended primarily for those who are implementing an
 * {@code ExecutorService}. Most users should call {@link ListeningExecutorService#submit(Callable)
 * ListeningExecutorService.submit} on a service obtained from {@link
 * MoreExecutors#listeningDecorator}.
 *

necessarily infringed by the use or sale of its Contribution alone or when
combined with the Program.

"Program" means the Contributions distributed in accordance with this Agreement.

"Recipient" means anyone who receives the Program under this Agreement, including
all Contributors.

   2. GRANT OF RIGHTS

a) Subject to the terms of this Agreement, each Contributor hereby grants

    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: proposal
    attributes:
      label: "Proposal"
      description: "What is the proposed change? Who does this proposal help, and why? Please describe as precisely as possible the change to the language."
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: language-spec-changes
    attributes:

 * </h4>
 *
 * <p>Users of {@code CompletableFuture} will likely want to continue using {@code
 * CompletableFuture}. {@code FluentFuture} is targeted at people who use {@code ListenableFuture},
 * who can't use Java 8, or who want an API more focused than {@code CompletableFuture}. (If you
 * need to adapt between {@code CompletableFuture} and {@code ListenableFuture}, consider <a

// user in the cluster, because they can be mounted by pods using the
// `clusterTrustBundle` projection.  All service accounts have read access to
// ClusterTrustBundles by default.  Users who only have namespace-level access
// to a cluster can read ClusterTrustBundles by impersonating a serviceaccount
// that they have access to.
//
// It can be optionally associated with a particular assigner, in which case it

   *
   * But no matter what we do, it's worth remembering that the resulting code is going to be unsound
   * in the presence of LegacyConverter, at least in the case of users who view the converter as a
   * Function<A, B> or who call convertAll (and for any checkers that apply @PolyNull-like semantics
   * to Converter.convert). So maybe we don't want to think too hard about how to prevent our

                .compare(Boolean.TRUE, true)
                .compare(Boolean.TRUE, Boolean.TRUE)
                .result())
        .isEqualTo(0);
  }

  public void testDegenerate() {
    // kinda bogus, but who cares?
    assertThat(ComparisonChain.start().result()).isEqualTo(0);
  }

  public void testOneEqual() {
    assertThat(ComparisonChain.start().compare("a", "a").result()).isEqualTo(0);
  }