id: error-handling-proposal
    attributes:
      label: Does this affect error handling?
      description: If so, how does this differ from previous error handling proposals?
      placeholder: |
       Yes or No

       If yes, 
        1.how does this differ from previous error handling proposals?

    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: generics-proposal
    attributes:

- Add fish shell completion to kubectl. ([#92989](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/92989), [@WLun001](https://github.com/WLun001))
- Add mechanism to load simple sniffer class into fluentd-elasticsearch image ([#92853](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/92853), [@cosmo0920](https://github.com/cosmo0920))
- Add support for Portworx plugin to csi-translation-lib. Alpha release
  

  }

  // Node sets are the same, but edge sets differ.
  @Test
  public void equivalent_edgeSetsDiffer() {
    network.addEdge(N1, N2, E12);

    MutableNetwork<Integer, String> g2 = createNetwork(edgeType);
    g2.addEdge(N1, N2, E13);

    assertThat(network).isNotEqualTo(g2);
  }

  // Node/edge sets are the same, but node/edge connections differ due to edge type.
  @Test

  }

  // Node sets are the same, but edge sets differ.
  @Test
  public void equivalent_edgeSetsDiffer() {
    network.addEdge(N1, N2, E12);

    MutableNetwork<Integer, String> g2 = createNetwork(edgeType);
    g2.addEdge(N1, N2, E13);

    assertThat(network).isNotEqualTo(g2);
  }

  // Node/edge sets are the same, but node/edge connections differ due to edge type.
  @Test

  private int length;

  @BeforeExperiment
  void setUp() throws Exception {
    Random r = new Random();
    ba1 = new byte[length];
    r.nextBytes(ba1);
    ba2 = Arrays.copyOf(ba1, ba1.length);
    // Differ at the last element
    ba3 = Arrays.copyOf(ba1, ba1.length);
    ba4 = Arrays.copyOf(ba1, ba1.length);
    ba3[ba1.length - 1] = (byte) 43;
    ba4[ba1.length - 1] = (byte) 42;

    graph.addNode(N1);

    MutableGraph<Integer> g2 = createGraph(edgeType);
    g2.addNode(N2);

    assertThat(graph).isNotEqualTo(g2);
  }

  // Node/edge sets are the same, but node/edge connections differ due to edge type.
  @Test
  public void equivalent_directedVsUndirected() {
    graph.putEdge(N1, N2);

    MutableGraph<Integer> g2 = createGraph(oppositeType(edgeType));
    g2.putEdge(N1, N2);

    graph.addNode(N1);

    MutableGraph<Integer> g2 = createGraph(edgeType);
    g2.addNode(N2);

    assertThat(graph).isNotEqualTo(g2);
  }

  // Node/edge sets are the same, but node/edge connections differ due to edge type.
  @Test
  public void equivalent_directedVsUndirected() {
    graph.putEdge(N1, N2);

    MutableGraph<Integer> g2 = createGraph(oppositeType(edgeType));
    g2.putEdge(N1, N2);

  private int length;

  @BeforeExperiment
  void setUp() throws Exception {
    Random r = new Random();
    ba1 = new byte[length];
    r.nextBytes(ba1);
    ba2 = Arrays.copyOf(ba1, ba1.length);
    // Differ at the last element
    ba3 = Arrays.copyOf(ba1, ba1.length);
    ba4 = Arrays.copyOf(ba1, ba1.length);
    ba3[ba1.length - 1] = (byte) 43;
    ba4[ba1.length - 1] = (byte) 42;

    // big-endian encoded. There is nothing special about this value; the only requirement
    // was some asymmetry so that the initial v0 and v1 differ from v2 and v3.
    private long v0 = 0x736f6d6570736575L;
    private long v1 = 0x646f72616e646f6dL;
    private long v2 = 0x6c7967656e657261L;
    private long v3 = 0x7465646279746573L;

	opts := minio.GetObjectOptions{}
	if srcCtnt.Size != tgtCtnt.Size {
		fmt.Printf("differ in size sourceSize: %d, targetSize: %d\n", srcCtnt.Size, tgtCtnt.Size)
		return false
	} else if srcCtnt.ContentType != tgtCtnt.ContentType {
		fmt.Printf("differ in contentType source: %s, target: %s\n", srcCtnt.ContentType, tgtCtnt.ContentType)
		return false
	}