further defined and clarified by project maintainers.

## Enforcement

Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
reported by contacting the project team at ******@****.***. The project team
will review and investigate all complaints, and will respond in a way that it deems
appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is obligated to maintain
confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

issue if there is one) requesting the feature and describing specific use cases
for it.

If the feature has merit, it will go through a thorough process of API design
and review. Any code should come after this.

[APIs]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_programming_interface
[issue]: https://github.com/google/guava/issues

Pull requests
-------------

    /*
     * The entrySet() of ConcurrentHashMap, unlike that of other Map
     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-May/thread.html#17367
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users

Ich höre gerne, wie **FastAPI** verwendet wird, was Ihnen daran gefallen hat, in welchem Projekt/Unternehmen Sie es verwenden, usw.

## Für FastAPI abstimmen

* <a href="https://www.slant.co/options/34241/~fastapi-review" class="external-link" target="_blank">Stimmen Sie für **FastAPI** auf Slant</a >.
* <a href="https://alternativeto.net/software/fastapi/about/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Stimmen Sie für **FastAPI** auf AlternativeTo</a>.

{* ../../docs_src/security/tutorial005_an_py310.py hl[5,9,13,47,65,106,108:116,122:125,129:135,140,156] *}

Now let's review those changes step by step.

## OAuth2 Security scheme

The first change is that now we are declaring the OAuth2 security scheme with two available scopes, `me` and `items`.

The `scopes` parameter receives a `dict` with each scope as a key and the description as the value:

But in this case, the same **FastAPI** application will handle the API and the authentication.

So, let's review it from that simplified point of view:

* The user types the `username` and `password` in the frontend, and hits `Enter`.

Consultez les documents concernant <a href="https://help.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-issues-and-pull-requests/about-pull-request-reviews" class="external-link" target="_blank">l'ajout d'un review de pull request</a> pour l'approuver ou demander des modifications.

///

J'aime entendre parler de l'utilisation du **FastAPI**, de ce que vous avez aimé dedans, dans quel projet/entreprise l'utilisez-vous, etc.

## Voter pour FastAPI

* <a href="https://www.slant.co/options/34241/~fastapi-review" class="external-link" target="_blank">Votez pour **FastAPI** sur Slant</a>.
* <a href="https://alternativeto.net/software/fastapi/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Votez pour **FastAPI** sur AlternativeTo</a>.

 * Any additional information that may be helpful.

After filing a report, a representative from the Square Code of Conduct committee will contact you
personally. The committee will then review the incident, follow up with any additional questions,
and make a decision as to how to respond.

Anyone asked to stop unacceptable behavior is expected to comply immediately. If an individual

import sys
import time
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any, Dict, List, Union, cast

import httpx
from github import Github
from pydantic import BaseModel, BaseSettings, SecretStr

awaiting_label = "awaiting-review"
lang_all_label = "lang-all"
approved_label = "approved-1"
translations_path = Path(__file__).parent / "translations.yml"

github_graphql_url = "https://api.github.com/graphql"