the same array length.</li>

	<li>Two slice types are identical if they have identical element types.</li>

	<li>Two struct types are identical if they have the same sequence of fields,
	    and if corresponding pairs of fields have the same names, identical types,
	    and identical tags, and are either both embedded or both not embedded.

	    the same array length.</li>

	<li>Two slice types are identical if they have identical element types.</li>

	<li>Two struct types are identical if they have the same sequence of fields,
	    and if corresponding fields have the same names, and identical types,
	    and identical tags.
	    <a href="#Exported_identifiers">Non-exported</a> field names from different

```sh
mc admin replicate info minio1
```

** Note **

* Correctness at startup; with the sequencing above, items are only processed once all informers are synced. This means queries will not return stale data at startup.
* Deduping of identical events
* Automatic retrying of failed events (configurable)

The above logic is critical to handle correctly to ensure correctness of a controller.

// in case of SSE-S3. However, storing the ETag of an encrypted
// object in plaintext may reveal some information about the object.
// For example, two objects with the same ETag are identical with
// a very high probability.
//
// Therefore, an S3 implementation may encrypt an ETag before storing
// it. In this case, the stored ETag may not be a well-formed S3 ETag.

## Overview

Replication relies on immutability provided by versioning to sync objects between the configured source and replication target. Replication results in the object data, metadata, last modification time and version ID all being identical between the source and target. Thus version ordering is automatically guaranteed on the source and target clusters.

### Replication of object version and metadata

      throws Throwable;

  /**
   * By default delegates to {@link Object#equals} so instances are only equal if they are
   * identical. {@code proxy.equals(argument)} returns true if:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@code proxy} and {@code argument} are of the same type
   *   <li>and this method returns true for the {@link InvocationHandler} of {@code argument}

      Correspondence.tolerance(ALLOWED_ERROR);

  /**
   * A {@link Correspondence} which accepts either finite values within {@link #ALLOWED_ERROR} of
   * each other or identical non-finite values.
   */
  private static final Correspondence<Double, Double> QUANTILE_CORRESPONDENCE =
      Correspondence.from(
          new BinaryPredicate<Double, Double>() {
            @Override

   * value that are {@linkplain Range#isConnected connected} to this range.
   *
   * <p>The behavior of {@link #get(Comparable) get(k)} after calling this method is identical to
   * the behavior described in {@link #put(Range, Object) put(range, value)}, however the ranges
   * returned from {@link #asMapOfRanges} will be different if there were existing entries which

         * with ours. Therefore, we have to be careful about whether we create our own TypeVariable:
         *
         * 2a. If the resolved types are identical to the original types, then we can return the
         * original, identical JDK TypeVariable. By doing so, we sidestep the problem entirely.
         *
         * 2b. If the resolved types are different from the original types, things are trickier. The