@GwtIncompatible // java.io.ObjectInputStream
  private void readObject(ObjectInputStream stream) throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
    stream.defaultReadObject();
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    // reading data stored by writeObject
    Comparator<? super E> comparator = (Comparator<? super E>) requireNonNull(stream.readObject());
    Serialization.getFieldSetter(AbstractSortedMultiset.class, "comparator").set(this, comparator);

labels.jobStatus=Status
labels.labelTypeIds=Label
labels.lang=Sprache
labels.outputs=Ziel
labels.pos=POS
labels.purgeJobLogDay=Bereinige Suchprotokoll nach
labels.purgeUserInfoDay=Bereinige Benutzer nach
labels.reading=Lesen
labels.roleTypeIds=Rollen-ID
labels.scriptData=Skript
labels.scriptResult=Suchergebnis
labels.scriptType=Executor
labels.segmentation=Segmentierung
labels.startTime=Startzeitpunkt
labels.target=Ziel

gain (about 100 nanoseconds), please note that in **FastAPI** the effect would be quite opposite. In these cases, it's better to use `async def` unless your *path operation functions* use code that performs blocking <abbr title="Input/Output: disk reading or writing, network communications.">I/O</abbr>.

Still, in both situations, chances are that **FastAPI** will [still be faster](index.md#performance){.internal-link target=_blank} than (or at least comparable to) your previous framework....

			case ObjectNotFound, InsufficientReadQuorum:
				retryWait()
				continue
			}
			// Allow one fast retry for other errors.
			if retries > 0 {
				return entries, fmt.Errorf("reading first part metadata: %v", err)
			}
			retryWait()
			continue
		}

		partN, err := o.findFirstPart(fi)
		switch {
		case err == nil:
		case errors.Is(err, io.ErrUnexpectedEOF):

      MockResponse(
        code = 503,
        headers = headersOf("Retry-After", "0"),
        body = "please retry",
      ),
    )
    server.enqueue(
      MockResponse(body = "thank you for retrying"),
    )
    val request =
      Request(
        url = server.url("/"),
        body =
          object : RequestBody() {
            var attempt = 0

Aún así, en ambas situaciones, es probable que **FastAPI** sea [aún más rápido](index.md#rendimiento){.Internal-link target=_blank} que (o al menos comparable) a tu framework anterior.

title: 'PyCon AU 2023: Testing asynchronous applications with FastAPI and pytest' - author: Sebastián Ramírez (tiangolo) author_link: https://twitter.com/tiangolo link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnpTY1f4k2U title: '[VIRTUAL] Py.Amsterdam''s flying Software Circus: Intro to FastAPI' - author: Sebastián Ramírez (tiangolo) author_link: https://twitter.com/tiangolo link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9K5pwb0rt8 title: 'PyConBY 2020: Serve ML models easily with FastAPI' - author: Chris Withers...

labels.labelTypeIds	=	Étiquettes
labels.lang	=	langue
labels.outputs	=	Cible
labels.pos	=	PDV
labels.purgeJobLogDay	=	Purger le journal des tâches avant
labels.purgeUserInfoDay	=	Purger l'utilisateur avant
labels.reading	=	Lecture
labels.roleTypeIds	=	ID de rôle
labels.scriptData	=	Scénario
labels.scriptResult	=	Résultat
labels.scriptType	=	Exécuteur
labels.segmentation	=	Segmentation
labels.startTime	=	Heure de début

		// coming up and trying to read format.json or create format.json
		return nil
	}
	storedDiskID, err := p.storage.GetDiskID()
	if err != nil {
		// return any error generated while reading `format.json`
		return err
	}
	if err == nil && *p.diskID.Load() == storedDiskID {
		return nil
	}
	// not the same disk we remember, take it offline.
	return errDiskNotFound
}

import junit.framework.AssertionFailedError;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Base class for JSR166 Junit TCK tests. Defines some constants, utility methods and classes, as
 * well as a simple framework for helping to make sure that assertions failing in generated threads
 * cause the associated test that generated them to itself fail (which JUnit does not otherwise
 * arrange). The rules for creating such tests are:
 *
 * <ol>