//   similar purposes.
  // * We want to behave reasonably for timeouts of 0
  // * We are more responsive to completion than timeouts. This is because parkNanos depends on
  //   system scheduling and as such we could either miss our deadline, or unpark() could be delayed
  //   so that it looks like we timed out even though we didn't. For comparison FutureTask respects

		"code": "gm2m_map_1", "name": "GMap1",
	}); err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("append map: %v", err)
	}
	AssertAssociationCount(t, user, "Languages", 1, "after append 1 map (generic file)")

	// Append more maps individually
	if err := DB.Model(&user).Association("Languages").Append(map[string]interface{}{"code": "gm2m_map_2", "name": "GMap2"}); err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("append map 2: %v", err)
	}

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;

public class NetworkInterfaceInfo {
    private int interfaceIndex;
    private int capability;
    private int linkSpeed;  // In units of 1 Mbps
    private byte[] sockaddrStorage;  // Socket address
    private InetAddress address;
    private boolean ipv6;
    private boolean rssCapable;  // Receive Side Scaling
    private boolean rdmaCapable;
    

import static com.google.common.collect.CollectPreconditions.checkNonnegative;
import static com.google.common.collect.Iterators.emptyIterator;
import static com.google.common.collect.Maps.immutableEntry;
import static java.lang.Math.max;
import static java.util.Arrays.asList;
import static java.util.Objects.requireNonNull;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;

   * ExecutionSequencer objects interfere with each other, which would be undesirable, in addition
   * to increasing the memory footprint of every thread that interacted with it. In order to release
   * entries in thread-specific maps when the ThreadLocal object itself is no longer referenced,
   * ThreadLocal is usually implemented with a WeakReference, which can have negative performance

  //   similar purposes.
  // * We want to behave reasonably for timeouts of 0
  // * We are more responsive to completion than timeouts. This is because parkNanos depends on
  //   system scheduling and as such we could either miss our deadline, or unpark() could be delayed
  //   so that it looks like we timed out even though we didn't. For comparison FutureTask respects

- The `CloudDualStackNodeIPs` feature is now `beta`, meaning that when using
  an external cloud provider that has been updated to support the feature,
  you can pass comma-separated dual-stack `--node-ips` to `kubelet` and have
  the cloud provider take both IPs into account. ([#120275](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/120275), [@danwinship](https://github.com/danwinship))

import com.google.common.collect.AbstractSequentialIterator;
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableMap;
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableSet;
import com.google.common.collect.Maps;
import com.google.common.primitives.Ints;
import com.google.common.util.concurrent.ExecutionError;
import com.google.common.util.concurrent.ListenableFuture;
import com.google.common.util.concurrent.SettableFuture;

     * @param userBean Optional user information for permission checking
     * @param searchRequestType Type of search request for role-based access control
     * @return List of document data maps
     */
    public List<Map<String, Object>> getDocumentListByDocIds(final String[] docIds, final String[] fields,
            final OptionalThing<FessUserBean> userBean, final SearchRequestType searchRequestType) {

import static com.google.common.collect.CollectPreconditions.checkNonnegative;
import static com.google.common.collect.Iterators.emptyIterator;
import static com.google.common.collect.Maps.immutableEntry;
import static java.lang.Math.max;
import static java.util.Arrays.asList;
import static java.util.Objects.requireNonNull;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;