}

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test fallback used when circuit is open")
    void testFallbackWhenOpen() throws Exception {
        // Open the circuit
        circuitBreaker.tripBreaker();

        String result = circuitBreaker.call(() -> "primary", () -> "fallback");

        assertEquals("fallback", result);
    }

    @Test

	tx := db.Begin()
	defer func() {
		if r := recover(); r != nil {
			tx.Rollback()
		}
	}()
	if err := tx.Error; err != nil {
		t.Errorf("Failed to start transaction, got error %v\n", err)
	}

	if err := tx.Where("name=?", "zzjin").Delete(&User{}).Error; err != nil {
		tx.Rollback()
		t.Errorf("Failed to run one transaction, got error %v\n", err)
	}

 * selected in the static initializer of AbstractFuture. This is convenient and performant but
 * introduces some testing difficulties. This test exercises the fallback strategies.
 *
 * <p>To force selection of our fallback strategies, we load {@link AbstractFuture} (and all of
 * {@code com.google.common.util.concurrent}) in degenerate class loaders which make certain
 * platform classes unavailable. Then we construct a test suite so we can run the normal

 * and performant but introduces some testing difficulties. This test exercises the two fallback
 * strategies.
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>SafeAtomicHelper: uses Atomic FieldsUpdaters to implement synchronization
 *   <li>SynchronizedHelper: uses {@code synchronized} blocks for synchronization
 * </ul>
 *
 * To force selection of our fallback strategies we load {@link AggregateFutureState} (and all of

package callbacks

import (
	"gorm.io/gorm"
)

func RawExec(db *gorm.DB) {
	if db.Error == nil && !db.DryRun {
		result, err := db.Statement.ConnPool.ExecContext(db.Statement.Context, db.Statement.SQL.String(), db.Statement.Vars...)
		if err != nil {
			db.AddError(err)
			return
		}

		db.RowsAffected, _ = result.RowsAffected()

		if db.Statement.Result != nil {
			db.Statement.Result.Result = result

            }
            return v;
        };
    }

    @SafeVarargs
    @Nonnull
    public static UnaryOperator<String> or(UnaryOperator<String>... callbacks) {
        return s -> {
            for (UnaryOperator<String> cb : callbacks) {
                String r = cb.apply(s);
                if (r != null) {
                    return r;
                }
            }
            return null;

package callbacks

import (
	"gorm.io/gorm"
)

func RowQuery(db *gorm.DB) {
	if db.Error == nil {
		BuildQuerySQL(db)
		if db.DryRun || db.Error != nil {
			return
		}

		if isRows, ok := db.Get("rows"); ok && isRows.(bool) {
			db.Statement.Settings.Delete("rows")
			db.Statement.Dest, db.Error = db.Statement.ConnPool.QueryContext(db.Statement.Context, db.Statement.SQL.String(), db.Statement.Vars...)
		} else {

package callbacks

import (
	"reflect"
	"sync"
	"testing"
	"time"

	"gorm.io/gorm"
	"gorm.io/gorm/clause"
	"gorm.io/gorm/schema"
)

var schemaCache = &sync.Map{}

func TestConvertToCreateValues_DestType_Slice(t *testing.T) {
	type user struct {
		ID    int `gorm:"primaryKey"`
		Name  string
		Email string `gorm:"default:(-)"`
		Age   int    `gorm:"default:(-)"`
	}

 * selected in the static initializer of AbstractFuture. This is convenient and performant but
 * introduces some testing difficulties. This test exercises the fallback strategies.
 *
 * <p>To force selection of our fallback strategies, we load {@link AbstractFuture} (and all of
 * {@code com.google.common.util.concurrent}) in degenerate class loaders which make certain
 * platform classes unavailable. Then we construct a test suite so we can run the normal

package callbacks

import (
	"reflect"

	"gorm.io/gorm"
)

func callMethod(db *gorm.DB, fc func(value interface{}, tx *gorm.DB) bool) {
	tx := db.Session(&gorm.Session{NewDB: true})
	if called := fc(db.Statement.ReflectValue.Interface(), tx); !called {
		switch db.Statement.ReflectValue.Kind() {
		case reflect.Slice, reflect.Array:
			db.Statement.CurDestIndex = 0
			for i := 0; i < db.Statement.ReflectValue.Len(); i++ {